Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28081610›Full record

ArticleACS infectious diseases2017

The Bare Essentials of Antibiotic Target Validation.

Lizbeth Hedstrom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS infectious diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Lizbeth HedstromDepartments of Biology and Chemistry, Brandeis University , 415 South Street, Waltham, Massachusetts 02453-9110, United States.

Funding

IMPDH-targeted antibiotics for select agentsR01AI093459 · NIAID · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI HEDSTROM, LIZBETH K. · 2011 to 2015
$5.3M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI093459
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The convergence of competitive fitness experiments and phenotypic screening would seem to be an auspicious beginning for validation of an antibacterial target. IMPDH was already identified an essential protein in Mycobacterium tuberculosis when not one, but two, groups discovered inhibitors with promising antitubercular activity. A new target appeared to be born. Surprisingly, the two groups came to completely different conclusions about the vulnerability of IMPDH and its future as a drug target. This viewpoint discusses these papers and how to resolve this conundrum.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryAntitubercular AgentsDrug DesignDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalHumansIMP DehydrogenaseModels, MolecularMycobacterium tuberculosisProtein ConformationReproducibility of ResultsAntitubercular AgentsIMP Dehydrogenase

Identifiers

PMID28081610
PMCPMC5520969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.