Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28081304›Full record

Trial reportCancer2017

Comparison of an AC-taxane versus AC-free regimen and paclitaxel versus docetaxel in patients with lymph node-positive breast cancer: Final results of the National Surgical Adjuvant Study of Breast Cancer 02 trial, a randomized comparative phase 3 study.

Toru Watanabe, Masaru Kuranami, Kenichi Inoue, Norikazu Masuda, Kenjiro Aogi, Shinji Ohno, Hiroji Iwata, Hirofumi Mukai, Yukari Uemura, Yasuo Ohashi

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Association of oral mucositis induced by anthracycline-cyclophosphamide and subsequent docetaxel treatment for perioperative breast cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Toru WatanabeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hamamatsu Oncology Center, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Masaru KuranamiDepartment of Surgery, Yamato Municipal Hospital, Yamato, Japan.
Kenichi InoueBreast Oncology, Saitama Cancer Center, Kita-Adachi, Japan.
Norikazu MasudaDivision of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Kenjiro AogiDepartment of Breast Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Japan.
Shinji OhnoBreast Oncology Center, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation of Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroji IwataDepartment of Breast Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Hirofumi MukaiDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
Yukari UemuraClinical Research Support Center (CresCent), The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasuo OhashiDepartment of Integrated Science and Engineering for Sustainable Society, Chuo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Aichi Cancer Center · JPChuo University · JPHamamatsu Medical Center · JPJapanese Foundation For Cancer Research · JPNational Cancer Center Hospital East · JPOsaka National Hospital · JPSaitama Cancer Center · JPShikoku Cancer Center · JPUniversity of Tokyo Hospital · JPYamato Municipal Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn postoperative patients with breast cancer, the combination of an anthracycline and cyclophosphamide (AC) followed by a taxane is a standard regimen. In the current study, the authors examined whether AC could be safely omitted, and compared the effectiveness of paclitaxel versus docetaxel.

methodsFemale postoperative patients with axillary lymph node-positive breast cancer were eligible for enrollment in this phase 3, open-label, randomized controlled trial at 84 centers in Japan. Patients were randomized to 4 cycles of doxorubicin at a dose of 60 mg/m

resultsOf 1060 patients, 1049 were treated and included in the intention-to-treat population. The DFS results did not demonstrate noninferiority between the AC-containing and the AC-free regimens (hazard ratio [HR], 1.19; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.982-1.448 [P

conclusionsNoninferiority in DFS was not demonstrated between the AC-containing and AC-free regimens. Compared with a similar regimen of paclitaxel, docetaxel appeared to increase the DFS. Cancer 2017;123:759-68. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAnthracyclinesAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsBridged-Ring CompoundsCyclophosphamideDisease-Free SurvivalDocetaxelFemaleHumansJapanLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMiddle AgedAnthracyclinesBridged-Ring CompoundsCyclophosphamideDocetaxelPaclitaxeltaxaneTaxoidsadjuvant therapydocetaxeldoxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC)-taxanepaclitaxelrandomized phase 3

Identifiers

PMID28081304
PMCPMC6668007
OpenAlexW2571781592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.