Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28081211›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Development and Validation of a Clinical Prediction Rule for Bacteremia among Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients in Outpatient Settings.

Sho Sasaki, Takeshi Hasegawa, Hiroo Kawarazaki, Atsushi Nomura, Daisuke Uchida, Takahiro Imaizumi, Masahide Furusho, Hiroki Nishiwaki, Shingo Fukuma, Yugo Shibagaki and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sho SasakiDepartment of Healthcare Epidemiology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Public Health, Kyoto, JAPAN.
Takeshi HasegawaCenter for Innovative Research for Communities and Clinical Excellence, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, JAPAN.
Hiroo KawarazakiDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inagi Municipal Hospital, Inagi, JAPAN.
Atsushi NomuraDepartment of Immunology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, JAPAN.
Daisuke UchidaDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inagi Municipal Hospital, Inagi, JAPAN.
Takahiro ImaizumiDepartment of Nephrology, Toyohashi Municipal Hospital, Toyohashi, JAPAN.
Masahide FurushoDepartment of Nephrology, Aso Iizuka Hospital, Iizuka, JAPAN.
Hiroki NishiwakiCenter for Innovative Research for Communities and Clinical Excellence, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, JAPAN.
Shingo FukumaDepartment of Healthcare Epidemiology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Public Health, Kyoto, JAPAN.
Yugo ShibagakiDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, JAPAN.
Shunichi FukuharaDepartment of Healthcare Epidemiology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Public Health, Kyoto, JAPAN.
Japanese investigatOrs with Innovative Network for Kidney Disease: JOINT-KD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo our knowledge, no reliable clinical prediction rule (CPR) for identifying bacteremia in hemodialysis (HD) patients has been established. The aim of this study was to develop a CPR for bacteremia in maintenance HD patients visiting the outpatient department.

methodsThis multicenter cohort study involved consecutive maintenance HD patients who visited the outpatient clinic or emergency room of seven Japanese institutions between August 2011 and July 2013. The outcome measure was bacteremia diagnosed based on the results of blood cultures. The candidate predictors for bacteremia were extracted through a literature review. A CPR for bacteremia was developed using a coefficient-based multivariable logistic regression scoring method, and calibration was performed. The test performance was then assessed for the CPR.

resultsOf 507 patients eligible for the study, we analyzed the 293 with a complete dataset for candidate predictors. Of these 293 patients, 48 (16.4%) were diagnosed with bacteremia. At the conclusion of the deviation process, body temperature ≥ 38.3°C, heart rate ≥ 125 /min, C-reactive protein ≥ 10 mg/dL, alkaline phosphatase >360 IU/L, and no prior antibiotics use within the past week were retained and scored. The CPR had a good fit for the model on calibration. The AUC of the CPR was 0.76, and for score CPR ≥ 2, the sensitivity and specificity were 89.6% and 51.4%, respectively.

conclusionsWe established a simple CPR for bacteremia in maintenance HD patients using routinely obtained clinical information in an outpatient setting. This model may facilitate more appropriate clinical decision making.

Indexed as

Logistic ModelsAgedAged, 80 and overAlkaline PhosphataseArea Under CurveBacteremiaBody TemperatureCohort StudiesC-Reactive ProteinEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHeart RateHumansKidney Failure, ChronicKlebsiella pneumoniaeMaleAlkaline PhosphataseC-Reactive Protein

Identifiers

PMID28081211
PMCPMC5231279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.