Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28081189›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Global Gene Expression Analysis of Cross-Protected Phenotype of Pectobacterium atrosepticum.

Vladimir Gorshkov, Stanford Kwenda, Olga Petrova, Elena Osipova, Yuri Gogolev, Lucy N Moleleki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Bacterial sensor evolved by decreasing complexity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. RpoS-Regulated Genes and Phenotypes in the Phytopathogenic BacteriumInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  3. An OFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Metabolic Modeling ofMicroorganisms · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vladimir GorshkovKazan Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics of Kazan Science Centre of Russian Academy of Sciences, Kazan, Russia.
Stanford KwendaDepartment of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Olga PetrovaKazan Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics of Kazan Science Centre of Russian Academy of Sciences, Kazan, Russia.
Elena OsipovaKazan Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics of Kazan Science Centre of Russian Academy of Sciences, Kazan, Russia.
Yuri GogolevKazan Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics of Kazan Science Centre of Russian Academy of Sciences, Kazan, Russia.
Lucy N MolelekiDepartment of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to adapt to adverse conditions permits many bacterial species to be virtually ubiquitous and survive in a variety of ecological niches. This ability is of particular importance for many plant pathogenic bacteria that should be able to exist, except for their host plants, in different environments e.g. soil, water, insect-vectors etc. Under some of these conditions, bacteria encounter absence of nutrients and persist, acquiring new properties related to resistance to a variety of stress factors (cross-protection). Although many studies describe the phenomenon of cross-protection and several regulatory components that induce the formation of resistant cells were elucidated, the global comparison of the physiology of cross-protected phenotype and growing cells has not been performed. In our study, we took advantage of RNA-Seq technology to gain better insights into the physiology of cross-protected cells on the example of a harmful phytopathogen, Pectobacterium atrosepticum (Pba) that causes crop losses all over the world. The success of this bacterium in plant colonization is related to both its virulence potential and ability to persist effectively under various stress conditions (including nutrient deprivation) retaining the ability to infect plants afterwards. In our previous studies, we showed Pba to be advanced in applying different adaptive strategies that led to manifestation of cell resistance to multiple stress factors. In the present study, we determined the period necessary for the formation of cross-protected Pba phenotype under starvation conditions, and compare the transcriptome profiles of non-adapted growing cells and of adapted cells after the cross-protective effect has reached the maximal level. The obtained data were verified using qRT-PCR. Genes that were expressed differentially (DEGs) in two cell types were classified into functional groups and categories using different approaches. As a result, we portrayed physiological features that distinguish cross-protected phenotype from the growing cells.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, BacterialPectobacterium

Identifiers

PMID28081189
PMCPMC5230779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.