Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28081174›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2017

Definition of Human Epitopes Recognized in Tetanus Toxoid and Development of an Assay Strategy to Detect Ex Vivo Tetanus CD4+ T Cell Responses.

Ricardo da Silva Antunes, Sinu Paul, John Sidney, Daniela Weiskopf, Jennifer M Dan, Elizabeth Phillips, Simon Mallal, Shane Crotty, Alessandro Sette, Cecilia S Lindestam Arlehamn

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Protein/AS01Cell reports. Medicine · 2021
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Th1 polarization inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Cell reports methods · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ricardo da Silva AntunesLa Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, La Jolla, California, United Ststes of America.
Sinu PaulLa Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, La Jolla, California, United Ststes of America.
John SidneyLa Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, La Jolla, California, United Ststes of America.
Daniela WeiskopfLa Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, La Jolla, California, United Ststes of America.
Jennifer M DanLa Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, La Jolla, California, United Ststes of America.
Elizabeth PhillipsInstitute for Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Simon MallalInstitute for Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Shane CrottyInstitute for Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Alessandro SetteLa Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, La Jolla, California, United Ststes of America.
Cecilia S Lindestam ArlehamnLa Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, La Jolla, California, United Ststes of America.
La Jolla Institute for Immunology · USMurdoch University · AU

Funding

Support Component D/Vaccine Discovery, Concept to ClinicUM1AI100663 · NIAID · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI BAROUCH, DAN H. · 2012 to 2018
$131.5M
Single-cell atlas of lung tissue-resident memory T cells reactive to upper and lower respiratory tract pathogensU19AI118626 · NIAID · LA JOLLA INSTITUTE FOR IMMUNOLOGY · PI Bjoern Peters · 2015 to 2026
$36.7M
HOPE Training GrantT32AI007384 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Sara Gianella Weibel, Scott L Letendre · 1990 to 2026
$9.7M
NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272200900044CNIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007384NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI118626NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI100663
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite widespread uses of tetanus toxoid (TT) as a vaccine, model antigen and protein carrier, TT epitopes have been poorly characterized. Herein we defined the human CD4+ T cell epitope repertoire by reevaluation of previously described epitopes and evaluation of those derived from prediction of HLA Class II binding. Forty-seven epitopes were identified following in vitro TT stimulation, with 28 epitopes accounting for 90% of the total response. Despite this diverse range of epitopes, individual responses were associated with only a few immunodominant epitopes, with each donor responding on average to 3 epitopes. For the top 14 epitopes, HLA restriction could be inferred based on HLA typing of the responding donors. HLA binding predictions re-identified the vast majority of known epitopes, and identified 24 additional novel epitopes. With these epitopes, we created a TT epitope pool, which allowed us to characterize TT responses directly ex vivo using a cytokine-independent Activation Induced Marker (AIM) assay. These TT responses were highly Th1 or Th2 polarized, which was dependent upon the original priming vaccine, either the cellular DTwP or acellular DTaP formulation. This polarization remained despite the original priming having occurred decades past and a recent booster immunization with a reduced acellular vaccine formulation. While TT responses following booster vaccination were not durably increased in magnitude, they were associated with a relative expansion of CD4+ effector memory T cells.

Indexed as

Epitope MappingImmunologic MemoryAdultEpitopes, T-LymphocyteFemaleHumansImmunoassayMaleTetanus ToxoidTh1 CellsTh2 CellsEpitopes, T-LymphocyteTetanus Toxoid

Identifiers

PMID28081174
PMCPMC5230748
OpenAlexW2578918711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.