Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28081155›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Evaluation of Bufadienolides as the Main Antitumor Components in Cinobufacin Injection for Liver and Gastric Cancer Therapy.

Xiaolu Wei, Nan Si, Yuefei Zhang, Haiyu Zhao, Jian Yang, Hongjie Wang, Lianmei Wang, Linyu Han, Baolin Bian

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Biochemical Characterisation andTropical life sciences research · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Bufadienolides ofPhytochemistry reviews : proceedings of the Phytochemical Society of Europe · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaolu WeiInstitute of Chinese Materia Medica China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Nan SiInstitute of Chinese Materia Medica China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yuefei ZhangChina Resources Sanjiu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, Shenzhen, Guangdong Province, China.
Haiyu ZhaoInstitute of Chinese Materia Medica China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jian YangInstitute of Chinese Materia Medica China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Hongjie WangInstitute of Chinese Materia Medica China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Lianmei WangInstitute of Chinese Materia Medica China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Linyu HanInstitute of Chinese Materia Medica China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Baolin BianInstitute of Chinese Materia Medica China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNChina Resources (China) · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCinobufacin injection, also known as huachansu, is a preparation form of Cinobufacini made from Cinobufacin extract liquid. Despite that Cinobufacin injection is shown to shrink liver and gastric tumors, improving patient survival and life quality, the effective components in Cinobufacin remain elusive. In this study, we aim to screen antitumor components from Cinobufacin injection to elucidate the most effective antitumor components for treatment of liver and gastric cancers. MATERIALS AND

methodsHigh performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and LC-MS/MS analysis were used to separate and determine the components in Cinobufacin injection. Inhibition rates of various components in Cinobufacin injection on liver and gastric cancer cells were determined with MTT assay; Hepatocellular carcinoma and gastric cancer models were used to assess the antitumor effect of the compounds in vivo.

resultsThe major constituents in Cinobufacin injection include peptides, nucleic acids, tryptamines and bufotalins. MTT assay revealed that bufadienolides had the best antitumor activity, with peptides being the second most effective components. Bufadienolides showed significant inhibition rates on gastric and hepatocellular tumour growth in vivo.

conclusionBufadienolides are the most effective components in Cinobufacini injection for the treatment of liver and gastric cancers. This discovery can greatly facilitate further research in improving the therapeutic effects of Cinobufacin injection, meanwhile reducing its adverse reaction.

Indexed as

Amphibian VenomsAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBufanolidesHep G2 CellsHumansMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred ICRMice, NudeNeoplasms, ExperimentalXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAmphibian VenomsAntineoplastic AgentsBufanolideshuachansu

Identifiers

PMID28081155
PMCPMC5231367
OpenAlexW2572966381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.