Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28081057›Full record

ArticleMorbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries (Washington, D.C. : 2002)2017

Reducing Potentially Excess Deaths from the Five Leading Causes of Death in the Rural United States

Macarena C Garcia, Mark Faul, Greta Massetti, Cheryll C Thomas, Yuling Hong, Ursula E Bauer, Michael F Iademarco

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Surveillance summaries (Washington, D.C. : 2002), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 129 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
129citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

129 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Addressing Access Barriers in Rural America: A Mixed-Methods Study of Wisconsin's Family Resource Centers.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The new Rural Emergency Hospital Designation Program: Will it improve access to care for rural Americans?The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

69 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Macarena C GarciaCenter for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, CDC.
Mark FaulNational Center for Injury Prevention and Control, CDC.
Greta MassettiNational Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC.
Cheryll C ThomasNational Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC.
Yuling HongNational Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC.
Ursula E BauerNational Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC.
Michael F IademarcoCenter for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, CDC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2014, the all-cause age-adjusted death rate in the United States reached a historic low of 724.6 per 100,000 population (1). However, mortality in rural (nonmetropolitan) areas of the United States has decreased at a much slower pace, resulting in a widening gap between rural mortality rates (830.5) and urban mortality rates (704.3) (1). During 1999–2014, annual age-adjusted death rates for the five leading causes of death in the United States (heart disease, cancer, unintentional injury, chronic lower respiratory disease (CLRD), and stroke) were higher in rural areas than in urban (metropolitan) areas (Figure 1). In most public health regions (Figure 2), the proportion of deaths among persons aged <80 years (U.S. average life expectancy) (2) from the five leading causes that were potentially excess deaths was higher in rural areas compared with urban areas (Figure 3). Several factors probably influence the rural-urban gap in potentially excess deaths from the five leading causes, many of which are associated with sociodemographic differences between rural and urban areas. Residents of rural areas in the United States tend to be older, poorer, and sicker than their urban counterparts (3). A higher proportion of the rural U.S. population reports limited physical activity because of chronic conditions than urban populations (4). Moreover, social circumstances and behaviors have an impact on mortality and potentially contribute to approximately half of the determining causes of potentially excess deaths (5).

Indexed as

Accident PreventionAgedCause of DeathChronic DiseaseHealth Status DisparitiesHeart DiseasesHumansNeoplasmsRespiratory Tract DiseasesRural PopulationStrokeUnited StatesUrban PopulationWounds and Injuries

Identifiers

PMID28081057
PMCPMC5829929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.