Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28081041›Full record

SynthesisTherapeutic drug monitoring2017

A Systematic Literature Review Approach to Estimate the Therapeutic Index of Selected Immunosuppressant Drugs After Renal Transplantation.

Jessica E Ericson, Kanecia O Zimmerman, Daniel Gonzalez, Chiara Melloni, Jeffrey T Guptill, Kevin D Hill, Huali Wu, Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Therapeutic drug monitoring, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Biologics in Kidney Transplantation: Why and How Should We Personalize Their Dosage?BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jessica E Ericson*Department of Pediatrics, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA;†Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC;‡Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, NC; and§Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
Kanecia O Zimmerman
Daniel Gonzalez
Chiara Melloni
Jeffrey T Guptill
Kevin D Hill
Huali Wu
Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez

Funding

Duke CTSA (Composite)UL1TR001117 · NCATS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BOULWARE, LEIGH E, LI, JENNIFER S · 2013 to 2017
$41.3M
Duke CTSA (Composite)KL2TR001115 · NCATS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BOULWARE, LEIGH E, KRAFT, MONICA · 2013 to 2017
$5.1M
Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Models for Optimal Drug Dosing in ChildrenR01HD076676 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI COHEN-WOLKOWIEZ, MICHAEL · 2014 to 2017
$2.6M
Institutional Training Grant in Pediatric Infectious DiseaseT32HD060558 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CUNNINGHAM, COLEEN K. · 2011 to 2015
$1.0M
Immunological biomarker studies in myasthenia gravisK23NS085049 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI GUPTILL, JEFFREY T · 2014 to 2018
$924k
Use of Physiologically-Based PK/PD Models to Streamline Drug ApprovalsK23HD083465 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI GONZALEZ, DANIEL · 2015 to 2019
$727k
Clinical Practice Data to Aid Narrow Therapeutic Index Drug ClassificationU01FD004858 · FDA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI COHEN-WOLKOWIEZ, MICHAEL · 2013 to 2014
$497k
FDA HHS U01 FD004858NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001115NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001117NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201300017CNIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201300017INIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201500006CNICHD NIH HHS HHSN275201000003CNICHD NIH HHS HHSN275201000003INICHD NIH HHS K23 HD083465NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD076676NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD060558NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS085049
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDrugs that exhibit close margins between therapeutic and toxic blood concentrations are considered to have a narrow therapeutic index (NTI). The Food and Drug Administration has proposed that NTI drugs should have more stringent bioequivalence standards for approval of generic formulations. However, many immunosuppressant drugs do not have a well-defined therapeutic index (TI).

methodsWe sought to determine whether safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic data obtained from the medical literature through a comprehensive literature search could be used to estimate the TI of cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and sirolimus. In this analysis, we considered TI ≤2 as a criterion to define a drug as having an NTI.

resultsPublished literature indicates that cyclosporine has a TI of 2-3, which falls just short of our criteria to be classified as having an NTI. We found sirolimus and tacrolimus to have a therapeutic range of 5-12 ng/mL and of 5-20 ng/mL, respectively, but were unable to calculate the TI.

conclusionsAlthough the current literature does not provide a clear indication that these drugs have an NTI, the routine use of therapeutic drug monitoring in clinical practice suggests that more stringent testing of their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties should be performed before the approval of generic formulations.

Indexed as

Therapeutic IndexCyclosporineDrug MonitoringDrugs, GenericHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsKidney TransplantationSirolimusTacrolimusTherapeutic EquivalencyCyclosporineDrugs, GenericImmunosuppressive AgentsSirolimusTacrolimus

Identifiers

PMID28081041
PMCPMC5235278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.