Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28080996›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2016

Mitigating amphibian chytridiomycoses in nature.

Trenton W J Garner, Benedikt R Schmidt, An Martel, Frank Pasmans, Erin Muths, Andrew A Cunningham, Che Weldon, Matthew C Fisher, Jaime Bosch

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evolution of research on global amphibian declines.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Mitigation of chytridiomycosis onMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Efficacy of Plant-Derived Fungicides at InhibitingJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Tracking, Synthesizing, and Sharing GlobalFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
  20. The amphibian complement system and chytridiomycosis.Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological and integrative physiology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Trenton W J GarnerInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regents Park, NW1 4RY London, UK trent.garner@ioz.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-0336-9706
Benedikt R SchmidtKarch, Passage Maximilien-de-Meuron 6, 2000 Neuchâtel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4023-1001
An MartelDepartment of Pathology, Bacteriology and Avian Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.
Frank PasmansDepartment of Pathology, Bacteriology and Avian Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.
Erin MuthsU.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Fort Collins, 2150 Centre Avenue Building C, Fort Collins, CO 80526, USA.
Andrew A CunninghamInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regents Park, NW1 4RY London, UK.
Che WeldonUnit for Environmental Research and Management, North-West University, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa.
Matthew C FisherDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1862-6402
Jaime BoschMuseo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC, José Gutiérrez Abascal 2, 28006 Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amphibians across the planet face the threat of population decline and extirpation caused by the disease chytridiomycosis. Despite consensus that the fungal pathogens responsible for the disease are conservation issues, strategies to mitigate their impacts in the natural world are, at best, nascent. Reducing risk associated with the movement of amphibians, non-amphibian vectors and other sources of infection remains the first line of defence and a primary objective when mitigating the threat of disease in wildlife. Amphibian-associated chytridiomycete fungi and chytridiomycosis are already widespread, though, and we therefore focus on discussing options for mitigating the threats once disease emergence has occurred in wild amphibian populations. All strategies have shortcomings that need to be overcome before implementation, including stronger efforts towards understanding and addressing ethical and legal considerations. Even if these issues can be dealt with, all currently available approaches, or those under discussion, are unlikely to yield the desired conservation outcome of disease mitigation. The decision process for establishing mitigation strategies requires integrated thinking that assesses disease mitigation options critically and embeds them within more comprehensive strategies for the conservation of amphibian populations, communities and ecosystems.This article is part of the themed issue 'Tackling emerging fungal threats to animal health, food security and ecosystem resilience'.

Indexed as

AmphibiansAnimalsChytridiomycotaMycoseschytridiomycosisconservation strategymitigation

Identifiers

PMID28080996
PMCPMC5095549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.