Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28080994›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2016

Global food and fibre security threatened by current inefficiencies in fungal identification.

Pedro W Crous, Johannes Z Groenewald, Bernard Slippers, Michael J Wingfield

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. MycoKeys · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Melatonin Mitigates the Infection ofAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. SUMOylation in fungi: A potential target for intervention.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Foliar pathogens of eucalypts.Studies in mycology · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. MycoKeys · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pedro W CrousCBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre, PO Box 85167, 3508 AD Utrecht, The Netherlands p.crous@cbs.knaw.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-9085-8825
Johannes Z GroenewaldCBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre, PO Box 85167, 3508 AD Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9474-6246
Bernard SlippersDepartment of Genetics, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, P. Bag X20, Pretoria 0028, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-1491-3858
Michael J WingfieldDepartment of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI), University of Pretoria, P. Bag X20, Pretoria 0028, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-9346-2009

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fungal pathogens severely impact global food and fibre crop security. Fungal species that cause plant diseases have mostly been recognized based on their morphology. In general, morphological descriptions remain disconnected from crucially important knowledge such as mating types, host specificity, life cycle stages and population structures. The majority of current fungal species descriptions lack even the most basic genetic data that could address at least some of these issues. Such information is essential for accurate fungal identifications, to link critical metadata and to understand the real and potential impact of fungal pathogens on production and natural ecosystems. Because international trade in plant products and introduction of pathogens to new areas is likely to continue, the manner in which fungal pathogens are identified should urgently be reconsidered. The technologies that would provide appropriate information for biosecurity and quarantine already exist, yet the scientific community and the regulatory authorities are slow to embrace them. International agreements are urgently needed to enforce new guidelines for describing plant pathogenic fungi (including key DNA information), to ensure availability of relevant data and to modernize the phytosanitary systems that must deal with the risks relating to trade-associated plant pathogens.This article is part of the themed issue 'Tackling emerging fungal threats to animal health, food security and ecosystem resilience'.

Indexed as

Dietary FiberFood SupplyFungiMycosesPlant DiseasesDietary Fibercryptic diversityDNA barcodingfungal taxonomy

Identifiers

PMID28080994
PMCPMC5095547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.