Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28080985›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2016

Emerging oomycete threats to plants and animals.

Lida Derevnina, Benjamin Petre, Ronny Kellner, Yasin F Dagdas, Mohammad Nasif Sarowar, Artemis Giannakopoulou, Juan Carlos De la Concepcion, Angela Chaparro-Garcia, Helen G Pennington, Pieter van West and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed
21.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 177 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Science advances · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Linalool combatseLife · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Lida DerevninaThe Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7983-4187
Benjamin PetreThe Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3204-4249
Ronny KellnerMax Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Carl-von-Linné-Weg 10, Cologne 50829, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4618-0110
Yasin F DagdasThe Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9502-355X
Mohammad Nasif SarowarDepartment of Fisheries Biology and Genetics, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0001-7122-5299
Artemis GiannakopoulouThe Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7629-3108
Juan Carlos De la ConcepcionThe Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7642-8375
Angela Chaparro-GarciaThe Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK.
Helen G PenningtonThe Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2980-9079
Pieter van WestInternational Centre for Aquaculture Research and Development, Aberdeen Oomycete Laboratory, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0767-6017
Sophien KamounThe Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UH, UK sophien.kamoun@tsl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-0290-0315
Norwich Research Park · GBBangladesh Agricultural University · BDMax Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research · DEUniversity of Aberdeen · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G012075/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oomycetes, or water moulds, are fungal-like organisms phylogenetically related to algae. They cause devastating diseases in both plants and animals. Here, we describe seven oomycete species that are emerging or re-emerging threats to agriculture, horticulture, aquaculture and natural ecosystems. They include the plant pathogens Phytophthora infestans, Phytophthora palmivora, Phytophthora ramorum, Plasmopara obducens, and the animal pathogens Aphanomyces invadans, Saprolegnia parasitica and Halioticida noduliformans For each species, we describe its pathology, importance and impact, discuss why it is an emerging threat and briefly review current research activities.This article is part of the themed issue 'Tackling emerging fungal threats to animal health, food security and ecosystem resilience'.

Indexed as

Animal DiseasesCommunicable Diseases, EmergingPlant DiseasesAnimalsAphanomycesIncidenceOomycetesPhytophthoraPlantsSaprolegniaagriculturediseaseenvironmentfood securityparasitespathogens

Identifiers

PMID28080985
PMCPMC5095538
OpenAlexW2530898509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.