Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28080979›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2016

The peatland vegetation burning debate: keep scientific critique in perspective. A response to Brown et al. and Douglas et al.

G Matt Davies, Nicholas Kettridge, Cathelijne R Stoof, Alan Gray, Rob Marrs, Davide Ascoli, Paulo M Fernandes, Katherine A Allen, Stefan H Doerr, Gareth D Clay and 2 more

Abstract readComment
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

G Matt DaviesSchool of Environment and Natural Resources, The Ohio State University, Kottman Hall, 2021 Coffey Road, Columbus, OH 43210, USA davies.411@osu.edu.
Nicholas KettridgeSchool of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B31 2DX, UK.
Cathelijne R StoofSoil Geography and Landscape Group, Wageningen University, PO Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Alan GrayNERC Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Edinburgh EH26 0QB, UK.
Rob MarrsSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GP, UK.
Davide AscoliDepartment of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Torino, Largo Paolo Braccini 2-10095, Grugliasco (TO), Italy.
Paulo M FernandesCentro de Investigação e de Tecnologias Agro-Ambientais e Biológicas, Universidade de Tras-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Vila Real, Portugal.
Katherine A AllenSchool of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GP, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3270-5817
Stefan H DoerrDepartment of Geography, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8700-9002
Gareth D ClaySchool of Environment, Education and Development, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Julia McMorrowSchool of Environment, Education and Development, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
Vigdis VandvikDepartment of Biology, University of Bergen, Postboks 7803, 5020 Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesFiresEcosystemEnvironmentUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID28080979
PMCPMC5062110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.