Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28080973›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2016

Changes in interoceptive processes following brain stimulation.

Olga Pollatos, Beate M Herbert, Sandra Mai, Thomas Kammer

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05684614 (Interoception and Emotion Regulation in Healthy Individuals), which is not on this map. Cited by 53 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05684614 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Interoception and Emotion Regulation in Healthy Individuals

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of ValenciaRan2022 to 2023Enrolled117ConditionsMood Change, Emotion RegulationArmsNegative mood induction procedure, Spontaneous emotion regulation task, Positive mood induction procedure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 134 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Emotional and Social Dimension of Abstract Concepts Meet with Interoception in Right Anterior Insula.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Interoception: Where do we go from here?Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Olga PollatosClinical and Health Psychology, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Albert Einstein Allee 41, Ulm, Germany olga.pollatos@uni-ulm.de.ORCID 0000-0002-0512-565X
Beate M HerbertClinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychology, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3284-4529
Sandra MaiClinical and Health Psychology, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Albert Einstein Allee 41, Ulm, Germany.
Thomas KammerSection for Neurostimulation, Department of Psychiatry, Ulm University, 89075 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2769-5645
Universität Ulm · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The processing and perception of individual internal bodily signals (interoception) has been differentiated to comprise different levels and processes involved. The so-called heartbeat-evoked potential (HEP) offers an additional possibility to examine automatic processing of cardiac signals. Knowledge on neural structures potentially supporting different facets of interoception is still sparse. One way to get insights into neuroanatomical function is to manipulate the activity of different brain structures. In this study, we used repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and a continuous theta-burst protocol to inhibit specific central locations of the interoceptive network including the right anterior insula and the right somatosensory cortices and assessed effects on interoceptive facets and the HEP in 18 male participants. Main results were that inhibiting anterior insula resulted in a significant decline in cardiac and respiratory interoceptive accuracy (IAc) and in a consistent decrease in perception confidence. Continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) over somatosensory cortices reduced only cardiac IAc and affected perception confidence. Inhibiting right anterior insula and right somatosensory cortices increased interoceptive sensibility and reduced the HEP amplitude over frontocentral locations. Our findings strongly suggest that cTBS is an effective tool to investigate the neural network supporting interoceptive processes.This article is part of the themed issue 'Interoception beyond homeostasis: affect, cognition and mental health'.

Indexed as

Heart RateInteroceptionRespiratory RateAdultCerebral CortexGermanyHumansMaleTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung AdultHEPinsulainteroceptioninteroceptive accuracysomatosensory cortexTMS

Identifiers

PMID28080973
PMCPMC5062104
OpenAlexW2530584382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.