Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28080971›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2016

Interoceptive dimensions across cardiac and respiratory axes.

Sarah N Garfinkel, Miranda F Manassei, Giles Hamilton-Fletcher, Yvo In den Bosch, Hugo D Critchley, Miriam Engels

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 132 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
132citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04125758 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Is Knowing the Body Knowing the Mind? Stress-physiology Coherence, Interoception, and Mindfulness

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Wisconsin, MadisonRan2020 to 2022Enrolled120ConditionsNot Seeking to Treat Any ConditionsArmsMindfulness training, Tracking time spent on mobile device
NCT07757815 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Multimodal Biomarkers and Robot-Guided Precision TMS for Early Detection and Treatment of Postpartum Depression

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MacauRan2026 to 2031Enrolled290ConditionsDepression, PostpartumArmsRepetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

132 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

72 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah N GarfinkelPsychiatry, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK s.garfinkel@bsms.ac.uk.
Miranda F ManasseiBrighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.
Giles Hamilton-FletcherSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Yvo In den BoschFaculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Hugo D CritchleyPsychiatry, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.
Miriam EngelsPsychiatry, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interoception refers to the sensing of signals concerning the internal state of the body. Individual differences in interoceptive sensitivity are proposed to account for differences in affective processing, including the expression of anxiety. The majority of investigations of interoceptive accuracy focus on cardiac signals, typically using heartbeat detection tests and self-report measures. Consequently, little is known about how different organ-specific axes of interoception relate to each other or to symptoms of anxiety. Here, we compare interoception for cardiac and respiratory signals. We demonstrate a dissociation between cardiac and respiratory measures of interoceptive accuracy (i.e. task performance), yet a positive relationship between cardiac and respiratory measures of interoceptive awareness (i.e. metacognitive insight into own interoceptive ability). Neither interoceptive accuracy nor metacognitive awareness for cardiac and respiratory measures was related to touch acuity, an exteroceptive sense. Specific measures of interoception were found to be predictive of anxiety symptoms. Poor respiratory accuracy was associated with heightened anxiety score, while good metacognitive awareness for cardiac interoception was associated with reduced anxiety. These findings highlight that detection accuracies across different sensory modalities are dissociable and future work can better delineate their relationship to affective and cognitive constructs.This article is part of the themed issue 'Interoception beyond homeostasis: affect, cognition and mental health'.

Indexed as

Heart RateInteroceptionRespiratory RateTouch PerceptionAdultAnxietyAwarenessEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adultanxietybody perceptioninteroceptionmindfulnessrespirationsomatosensory

Identifiers

PMID28080971
PMCPMC5062102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.