Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28080957›Full record

ArticleThe Permanente journal2017

Understanding Preferences for Osteoporosis Information to Develop an Osteoporosis Patient Education Brochure.

Stephanie W Edmonds, Samantha L Solimeo, Vu-Thuy Nguyen, Nicole C Wright, Douglas W Roblin, Kenneth G Saag, Peter Cram

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Permanente journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01507662 (Patient Activation After DXA Result Notification), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01507662 nacompletednot on this map

Patient Activation After DXA Result Notification

TypeinterventionalSponsorFredric D WolinskyRan2012 to 2015Enrolled7,749ConditionsOsteoporosis, Bone Diseases, MetabolicArmsBone Mineral Density Result Letter and Bone Health Brochure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Non-participation in systematic screening for osteoporosis-the ROSE trial.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2017
    Trial
  3. The effects of a patient activation intervention on smoking and excessive drinking cessations: results from the PAADRN randomized controlled trial.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2017
    Trial
  4. The cost of a patient activation intervention for achieving successful outcomes: results from the PAADRN randomized controlled trial.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2017
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Patient-activation and guideline-concordant pharmacological treatment after bone density testing: the PAADRN randomized controlled trial.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2016
    Trial
  7. Activating Patients With a Tailored Bone Density Test Results Letter and Educational Brochure: the PAADRN Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry
    Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stephanie W EdmondsProject Coordinator and a Doctoral Candidate at the College of Nursing, University of Iowa in Iowa City and a Veterans Affairs Quality Scholar at the Iowa City Veterans Affairs Health Care System. stephanie-edmonds@uiowa.edu.
Samantha L SolimeoAssistant Professor at the Carver College of Medicine University of Iowa and an Investigator at the Iowa City Veterans Affairs Health Care System. samantha-solimeo@uiowa.edu.
Vu-Thuy NguyenGraduate Research Assistant and Doctoral Candidate at the College of Public Health, University of Iowa in Iowa City. thuy-v-nguyen@uiowa.edu.
Nicole C WrightAssistant Professor in the Department of Epidemiology at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. ncwright@uab.edu.
Douglas W RoblinProfessor at the School of Public Health at Georgia State University and a Consulting Research Scientist with the Center for Clinical and Outcomes Research at Kaiser Permanente in Atlanta. droblin@gsu.edu.
Kenneth G SaagProfessor of Medicine in the Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. ksaag@uabmc.edu.
Peter CramDirector of the Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics at University Health Network and Mount Sinai Hospital and a Professor of Internal Medicine at the University of Toronto in Ontario, Canada. peter.cram@uhn.ca.

Funding

A Patient Activation Intervention to Enhance Bone HealthR01AG033035 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI WOLINSKY, FREDRIC D · 2010 to 2014
$7.0M
UAB K12 in Patient Centered Outcomes ResearchK12HS023009 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI SAAG, KENNETH G · 2014 to 2018
$4.0M
Building Musculoskeletal Outcomes Research at the University of IowaK24AR062133 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI CRAM, PETER M · 2012 to 2016
$594k
AHRQ HHS K12 HS023009HSRD VA IK2 HX001542NIAMS NIH HHS K24 AR062133NIA NIH HHS R01 AG033035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextPatient education materials can provide important information related to osteoporosis prevention and treatment. However, available osteoporosis education materials fail to follow best-practice guidelines for patient education.

objectiveTo develop an educational brochure on bone health for adults aged 50 years and older using mixed-method, semistructured interviews.

designThis project consisted of 3 phases. In Phase 1, we developed written content that included information about osteoporosis. Additionally, we designed 2 graphic-rich brochures, Brochure A (photographs) and Brochure B (illustrations). In Phase 2, interviewers presented the text-only document and both brochure designs to 53 participants from an academic Medical Center in the Midwest and an outpatient clinic in the Southeastern region of the US. Interviewers used open- and closed-ended questions to elicit opinions regarding the brochures. In Phase 3, using feedback from Phase 2, we revised the brochure and presented it to 11 participants at a third site in the Southeastern US.

main outcome measuresParticipants' comprehension of brochure text and acceptability of brochure design.

resultsWe enrolled 64 participants. Most were women, white, and college-educated, with an average age of 66.1 years. Participants were able to restate the basic content of the brochure and preferred Brochure A's use of photographs.

conclusionsUsing feedback from older adults, we developed and refined a brochure for communicating bone health information to older adults at risk of osteoporosis and fragility fractures. The methods outlined in this article may serve to guide others in developing health educational brochures for chronic medical conditions.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyOsteoporosisPatient ParticipationPatient PreferenceAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPamphletsPatient Education as TopicPilot ProjectsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID28080957
PMCPMC5224797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.