Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28079371›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2017

Binding Pose Flip Explained via Enthalpic and Entropic Contributions.

Michael Schauperl, Paul Czodrowski, Julian E Fuchs, Roland G Huber, Birgit J Waldner, Maren Podewitz, Christian Kramer, Klaus R Liedl

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Core Flipping in Lead Optimization: Rank Ordering Using λ-Dynamics.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Hydration of Aromatic Heterocycles as an Adversary of π-Stacking.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Michael SchauperlInstitute of General, Inorganic and Theoretical Chemistry, and Center for Molecular Biosciences Innsbruck (CMBI), University of Innsbruck , Innrain 80-82, 6020 Innsbruck, Tyrol, Austria.
Paul CzodrowskiDiscovery Technologies, Merck Serono Research, Merck Serono R&D, Merck KGaA , Frankfurter Strasse 250, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany.
Julian E FuchsInstitute of General, Inorganic and Theoretical Chemistry, and Center for Molecular Biosciences Innsbruck (CMBI), University of Innsbruck , Innrain 80-82, 6020 Innsbruck, Tyrol, Austria.
Roland G HuberBioinformatics Institute (BII), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR) , #07-01 Matrix, 30 Biopolis Street, 138671, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-5093-5988
Birgit J WaldnerInstitute of General, Inorganic and Theoretical Chemistry, and Center for Molecular Biosciences Innsbruck (CMBI), University of Innsbruck , Innrain 80-82, 6020 Innsbruck, Tyrol, Austria.
Maren PodewitzInstitute of General, Inorganic and Theoretical Chemistry, and Center for Molecular Biosciences Innsbruck (CMBI), University of Innsbruck , Innrain 80-82, 6020 Innsbruck, Tyrol, Austria.
Christian KramerInstitute of General, Inorganic and Theoretical Chemistry, and Center for Molecular Biosciences Innsbruck (CMBI), University of Innsbruck , Innrain 80-82, 6020 Innsbruck, Tyrol, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8663-5266
Klaus R LiedlInstitute of General, Inorganic and Theoretical Chemistry, and Center for Molecular Biosciences Innsbruck (CMBI), University of Innsbruck , Innrain 80-82, 6020 Innsbruck, Tyrol, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-0985-2299
Universität Innsbruck · ATAgency for Science, Technology and Research · SGMerck (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The anomalous binding modes of five highly similar fragments of TIE2 inhibitors, showing three distinct binding poses, are investigated. We report a quantitative rationalization for the changes in binding pose based on molecular dynamics simulations. We investigated five fragments in complex with the transforming growth factor β receptor type 1 kinase domain. Analyses of these simulations using Grid Inhomogeneous Solvation Theory (GIST), pK

Indexed as

EntropyDrug DiscoveryMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein BindingProtein DomainsReceptor, TIE-2SolventsWaterReceptor, TIE-2SolventsWater

Identifiers

PMID28079371
PMCPMC5331458
OpenAlexW2577617335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.