Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28079318›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea)2017

Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy and Becker Muscular Dystrophy Confirmed by Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification: Genotype-Phenotype Correlation in a Large Cohort.

Seena Vengalil, Veeramani Preethish-Kumar, Kiran Polavarapu, Manjunath Mahadevappa, Deepha Sekar, Meera Purushottam, Priya Treesa Thomas, Saraswathi Nashi, Atchayaram Nalini

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Molecular genetics of dystrophinopathy.Journal of human genetics · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Seena VengalilDepartment of Neurology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India.
Veeramani Preethish-KumarDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India.
Kiran PolavarapuDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India.
Manjunath MahadevappaDepartment of Neurology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India.
Deepha SekarDepartment of Molecular Genetics, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India.
Meera PurushottamDepartment of Molecular Genetics, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India.
Priya Treesa ThomasDepartment of Psychiatric Social Work, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India.
Saraswathi NashiDepartment of Neurology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India.
Atchayaram NaliniDepartment of Neurology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India. atchayaramnalini@yahoo.co.in.
National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeStudies of cases of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD) confirmed by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) have determined the clinical characteristics, genotype, and relations between the reading frame and phenotype for different countries. This is the first such study from India.

methodsA retrospective genotype-phenotype analysis of 317 MLPA-confirmed patients with DMD or BMD who visited the neuromuscular clinic of a quaternary referral center in southern India.

resultsThe 317 patients comprised 279 cases of DMD (88%), 32 of BMD (10.1%), and 6 of intermediate phenotype (1.9%). Deletions accounted for 91.8% of cases, with duplications causing the remaining 8.2%. There were 254 cases of DMD (91%) with deletions and 25 (9%) due to duplications, and 31 cases (96.8%) of BMD with deletions and 1 (3.2%) due to duplication. All six cases of intermediate type were due to deletions. The most-common mutation was a single-exon deletion. Deletions of six or fewer exons constituted 68.8% of cases. The deletion of exon 50 was the most common. The reading-frame rule held in 90% of DMD and 94% of BMD cases. A tendency toward a lower IQ and earlier wheelchair dependence was observed with distal exon deletions, though a significant correlation was not found.

conclusionsThe reading-frame rule held in 90% to 94% of children, which is consistent with reports from other parts of the world. However, testing by MLPA is a limitation, and advanced sequencing methods including analysis of the structure of mutant dystrophin is needed for more-accurate assessments of the genotype-phenotype correlation.

Indexed as

Becker muscular dystrophyDuchenne muscular dystrophygenotypephenotype

Identifiers

PMID28079318
PMCPMC5242159
OpenAlexW2572179268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.