Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28078523›Full record

Trial reportJournal of robotic surgery2017

Simple vs six-branches autologous suburethral sling during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy to improve early urinary continence recovery: prospective randomized study.

Andrea Cestari, Matteo Ferrari, Mattia Sangalli, Matteo Zanoni, Massimo Ghezzi, Fabio Fabbri, Francesco Sozzi, Carolina Lolli, Vincenzo Dell'Acqua, Patrizio Rigatti

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of robotic surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrea CestariDepartment of Urology-Advanced Urotechnology Center, Scientific Institute "Istituto Auxologico Italiano", Via Mercalli 30, 20122, Milan, Italy. a.cestari@auxologico.it.
Matteo FerrariDepartment of Urology-Advanced Urotechnology Center, Scientific Institute "Istituto Auxologico Italiano", Via Mercalli 30, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Mattia SangalliDepartment of Urology-Advanced Urotechnology Center, Scientific Institute "Istituto Auxologico Italiano", Via Mercalli 30, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Matteo ZanoniDepartment of Urology-Advanced Urotechnology Center, Scientific Institute "Istituto Auxologico Italiano", Via Mercalli 30, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Massimo GhezziDepartment of Urology-Advanced Urotechnology Center, Scientific Institute "Istituto Auxologico Italiano", Via Mercalli 30, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Fabio FabbriDepartment of Urology-Advanced Urotechnology Center, Scientific Institute "Istituto Auxologico Italiano", Via Mercalli 30, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Francesco SozziDepartment of Urology-Advanced Urotechnology Center, Scientific Institute "Istituto Auxologico Italiano", Via Mercalli 30, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Carolina LolliDepartment of Urology-Advanced Urotechnology Center, Scientific Institute "Istituto Auxologico Italiano", Via Mercalli 30, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Vincenzo Dell'AcquaDepartment of Urology-Advanced Urotechnology Center, Scientific Institute "Istituto Auxologico Italiano", Via Mercalli 30, 20122, Milan, Italy.
Patrizio RigattiDepartment of Urology-Advanced Urotechnology Center, Scientific Institute "Istituto Auxologico Italiano", Via Mercalli 30, 20122, Milan, Italy.
IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have recently described the use of a retropubic suburethral autologous sling created and placed during robotic radical prostatectomy (RARP). In this study, we assess the effectiveness of newly designed six-branches compared to two-branches suburethral autologous sling in improving early urinary continence (UC) recovery. 120 patients submitted to RARP were prospectively randomized according to the intraoperative positioning of six-branches (group 1, n = 60) or two-branches autologous sling (group 2, n = 60) obtained by different configuration of a same tract of vas deferens removed. Early UC recovery was assessed at 5 (catheter removal), 10 and 30 days postoperatively through the daily number of pads used and the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence-Short Form (ICIQ-UI-SF) score. UC was defined as the non-use of pad. Chi square test and Wilcoxon test were used to investigate UC recovery between the two groups. Moreover, post-voiding residual was evaluated in each patient at the same time. At catheter removal, UC rate was in groups 1 and 2, 60 and 35% (p = 0.02); at 10 days 70 and 46% (p = 0.03); at 30 days 87 and 70% (p = 0.04), respectively. One patient in group 1 experienced acute urinary retention at the time of catheter removal and was treated uneventfully with a further 7-day catheterization. These preliminary data indicate that newly designed six-branches suburethral autologous sling is able to increase the rate of early UC recovery compared to the two-arms sling previously described by us.

Indexed as

Suburethral SlingsAgedAged, 80 and overHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesProstatectomyRobotic Surgical ProceduresUrinary IncontinenceProstate cancerRetropubic slingRobotic radical prostatectomyUrinary incontinence

Identifiers

PMID28078523
OpenAlexW2574040848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.