ArticleJournal of gastroenterology2017
New resistance-associated substitutions and failure of dual oral therapy with daclatasvir and asunaprevir.
Article in Journal of gastroenterology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of the susceptibility of refractory hepatitis C virus resistant to nonstructural 5A inhibitors.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A Systematic Review of Direct-Acting Antivirals for Hepatitis C in Advanced CKD.Kidney international reports · 2023Article
- Article
- Impact of novel NS5A resistance-associated substitutions of hepatitis C virus detected in treatment-experienced patients.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDaclatasvir (DCV) and asunaprevir (ASV) combination therapy has been primarily used in patients without NS5A L31 or Y93 resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) before treatment. We examined the characteristics of patients without these baseline RASs who did not achieve hepatitis C virus eradication with DCV and ASV combination therapy and identified new baseline NS5A RASs that are closely associated with failure of combination therapy.
methodsThree hundred thirty-five patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection with no NS5A L31, NS5A Y93, and NS3 D168 RASs before DCV and ASV combination therapy and no history of protease inhibitor therapy were enrolled. All RASs were evaluated by direct sequencing.
resultsSustained virologic response at 12 weeks (SVR12) was achieved in 297 patients (89%). Patients with NS5A Q24, L28, and/or R30 RASs or concomitant NS5A F37 and Q54 RASs had a significantly lower SVR12 rate than patients without these RASs (70% vs 92%, p < 0.001 and 79% vs 92%, p = 0.002 respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that NS5A Q24, L28, and/or R30 RASs and concomitant NS5A F37 and Q54 RASs were significantly associated with virologic failure. The SVR12 rate in patients without NS5A Q24, L28, and/or R30 RASs and concomitant NS5A F37 and Q54 RASs was 96.2% (202/210).
conclusionsIn patients without NS5A L31 or Y93 RASs, the presence of NS5A Q24, L28, and/or R30 RASs and concomitant NS5A F37 and Q54 RASs at the baseline was associated with failure of DCV and ASV combination therapy. The coexistence of baseline RASs other than NS5A L31 and Y93 may affect the therapeutic effectiveness of DCV and ASV combination therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.