Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28078461›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2017

Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic appendectomy: a Markov model.

Karina Newhall, Benjamin Albright, Anna Tosteson, Elissa Ozanne, Thadeus Trus, Philip P Goodney

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Karina NewhallVA Outcomes Group, White River Junction Veterans Affairs Hospital, White River Junction, VT, USA. Karina.A.Newhall@hitcock.org.
Benjamin AlbrightYale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Anna TostesonDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Elissa OzanneThe Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Thadeus TrusDepartment of Surgery, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, One Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Philip P GoodneyVA Outcomes Group, White River Junction Veterans Affairs Hospital, White River Junction, VT, USA.
Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center · USDartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice · USWhite River Junction VA Medical Center · USYale University · US

Funding

Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Steven D Leach · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAppendectomy is the most common emergency surgery performed in the USA. Removal of a non-inflamed appendix during unrelated abdominal surgery (prophylactic or incidental appendectomy) can prevent the downstream risks and costs of appendicitis. It is unknown whether such a strategy could be cost saving for the health system.

methodsWe considered hypothetical patient cohorts of varying ages from 18 to 80, undergoing elective laparoscopic abdominal and pelvic procedures. A Markov decision model using cost per life-year as the main outcome measure was constructed to simulate the trade-off between cost and risk of prophylactic appendectomy and the ongoing risk of developing appendicitis, with downstream costs and risks. Rates, probabilities, and costs of disease, treatment, and outcomes by patient age and gender were extracted from the literature. Sensitivity analyses were conducted using complications and costs of prophylactic appendectomy.

resultsWith our base-case assumptions, including added cost of prophylactic appendectomy of $660, we find that prophylactic removal of the appendix is cost saving for males aged 18-27 and females aged 18-28 undergoing elective surgery. The margin of cost savings depends on remaining life-years and increases exponentially with age: a 20-year-old female undergoing elective surgery could save $130 over a lifetime by undergoing prophylactic appendectomy, while a 40-year-old female would lose $130 over a lifetime. When the risk of the prophylactic appendectomy exceeds the risk of laparoscopic appendectomy for appendicitis or the cost exceeds $1080, it becomes more cost saving to forego the prophylactic procedure.

conclusionsProphylactic appendectomy can be cost saving for patients younger than age thirty undergoing elective laparoscopic abdominal and pelvic procedures.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAppendectomyAppendicitisCost SavingsFemaleHumansMaleMarkov ChainsMiddle AgedModels, EconomicUnited StatesYoung AdultAppendectomyCost utility analysisProphylactic surgical procedures

Identifiers

PMID28078461
OpenAlexW2572205834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.