ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2016
Radioembolization with
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Radioembolization Versus Bland Embolization for Hepatic Metastases from Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors: Short-Term Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial.World journal of surgery · 2018Trial
- Yttrium-90 Selective Internal Radiation Therapy for Neuroendocrine Liver Metastases: An Institutional Case Series, Updated Systematic Review, and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Clinical and dosimetric considerations for yttrium-90 glass microspheres radioembolization of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, metastatic colorectal carcinoma, and metastatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: recommendations from an international multidisciplinary working group.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Review
- Detection of Shortwave-Infrared Cerenkov Luminescence from Medical Isotopes.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023Article
- Phase I prospective trial of TAS-102 (trifluridine and tipiracil) and radioembolization withBMC cancer · 2022Article
- Review
- Currently available treatment options for neuroendocrine liver metastases.Annals of gastroenterology · 2021Review
- Interventional Liver-Directed Therapy for Neuroendocrine Metastases: Current Status and Future Directions.Current treatment options in oncology · 2020Review
- Transarterial Radioembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Hepatic Metastases: Clinical Aspects and Dosimetry Models.Seminars in radiation oncology · 2020Review
- Prognostic and predictive factors on overall survival and surgical outcomes in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: recent advances and controversies.Expert review of anticancer therapy · 2019Review
- Non-Pharmacological Therapeutic Options for Liver Metastases in Advanced Neuroendocrine Tumors.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Review
- Everolimus in the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors: efficacy, side-effects, resistance, and factors affecting its place in the treatment sequence.Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy · 2018Article
- Liver transarterial embolizations in metastatic neuroendocrine tumors.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2017Review
- Liver Metastases in Pancreatic Acinar Cell Carcinoma Treated with Selective Internal Radiation Therapy with Y-90 Resin Microspheres.Case reports in hepatology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis prospective pilot single-institution study was undertaken to document the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of radioembolization of liver-dominant metastatic gastrointestinal cancer using
methodsBetween June 2010 and October 2013, 42 adult patients (26 men, 16 women; median age 60 years) with metastatic chemotherapy-refractory unresectable colorectal (n=21), neuroendocrine (n=11), intrahepatic bile duct (n=7), pancreas (n=2), and esophageal (n=1) carcinomas underwent 60 lobar or segmental administrations of
resultsMedian target dose and activity were 109.4 Gy and 2.6 GBq per treatment session, respectively. Majority of clinical AE were grade 1 or 2 in severity. Patients with colorectal cancer had hepatic objective response rate (ORR) of 25% and a hepatic disease control rate (DCR) of 80%. Median PFS and OS were 1.0 and 4.4 months, respectively. Patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NET) had hepatic ORR and DCR of 73% and 100%, respectively. Median PFS was 8.9 months for this cohort. DCR and median PFS and OS for patients with cholangiocarcinoma were 86%, 1.1 months, and 6.7 months, respectively.
conclusions
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.