Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28077933›Full record

ArticleJournal of statistical software2016

Hana Ševčíková, Adrian E Raftery

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of statistical software, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Probabilistic forecasts of international bilateral migration flows.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Journal of statistical software · 2016
    Article
  14. Bayesian Population Projections for the United Nations.Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics · 2014
    Article
  15. Bayesian probabilistic population projections for all countries.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2012
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hana ŠevčíkováCenter for Statistics and the Social Sciences, University of Washington, Box 354322, Seattle, WA 98195-4322, USA.
Adrian E RafteryDepartments of Statistics and Sociology, University of Washington, Box 354320, Seattle, WA 98195-4320, USA.

Funding

Statistical Methods for Population ProjectionsR01HD070936 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RAFTERY, ADRIAN E · 2012 to 2021
$3.3M
Sexually Transmitted Infection Epidemics: Bayesian Prevalence & Size EstimateR01HD054511 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RAFTERY, ADRIAN E · 2007 to 2016
$3.2M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD054511NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD070936
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe

Indexed as

Bayesian hierarchical modelexpression languagepopulation projectionspopulation pyramidUnited NationsWorld Population Prospects

Identifiers

PMID28077933
PMCPMC5221849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.