Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28077776›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2017

Odour-based discrimination of similarity at the major histocompatibility complex in birds.

Sarah Leclaire, Maria Strandh, Jérôme Mardon, Helena Westerdahl, Francesco Bonadonna

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
16.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah LeclaireCentre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, CNRS-CEFE, 1919 route de Mende, 34293 Montpellier, France sarah.leclaire@free.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-4579-5850
Maria StrandhMolecular Ecology and Evolution Lab, Lund University, Ecology building, 22362 Lund, Sweden.
Jérôme MardonCentre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, CNRS-CEFE, 1919 route de Mende, 34293 Montpellier, France.
Helena WesterdahlMolecular Ecology and Evolution Lab, Lund University, Ecology building, 22362 Lund, Sweden.
Francesco BonadonnaCentre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, CNRS-CEFE, 1919 route de Mende, 34293 Montpellier, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRLund University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many animals are known to preferentially mate with partners that are dissimilar at the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) in order to maximize the antigen binding repertoire (or disease resistance) in their offspring. Although several mammals, fish or lizards use odour cues to assess MHC similarity with potential partners, the ability of birds to assess MHC similarity using olfactory cues has not yet been explored. Here we used a behavioural binary choice test and high-throughput-sequencing of MHC class IIB to determine whether blue petrels can discriminate MHC similarity based on odour cues alone. Blue petrels are seabirds with particularly good sense of smell, they have a reciprocal mate choice and are known to preferentially mate with MHC-dissimilar partners. Incubating males preferentially approached the odour of the more MHC-dissimilar female, whereas incubating females showed opposite preferences. Given their mating pattern, females were, however, expected to show preference for the odour of the more MHC-dissimilar male. Further studies are needed to determine whether, as in women and female mice, the preference varies with the reproductive cycle in blue petrel females. Our results provide the first evidence that birds can use odour cues only to assess MHC dissimilarity.

Indexed as

Major Histocompatibility ComplexMating Preference, AnimalOdorantsAnimalsBirdsFemaleMaleSmellblue petrelsmajor histocompatibility complexmate choicescent

Identifiers

PMID28077776
PMCPMC5247505
OpenAlexW2572498564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.