Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28077764›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2017

Antimicrobial peptide coatings for hydroxyapatite: electrostatic and covalent attachment of antimicrobial peptides to surfaces.

Leigh Townsend, Richard L Williams, Olachi Anuforom, Matthew R Berwick, Fenella Halstead, Erik Hughes, Artemis Stamboulis, Beryl Oppenheim, Julie Gough, Liam Grover and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Harnessing biomolecules for bioinspired dental biomaterials.Journal of materials chemistry. B · 2020
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Anti-Biofouling Coatings on the Tooth Surface and Hydroxyapatite.International journal of nanomedicine · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Leigh TownsendInstitute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Richard L WilliamsSchool of Chemical Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Olachi AnuforomInstitute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Matthew R BerwickSchool of Chemistry, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Fenella HalsteadUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK.
Erik HughesSchool of Chemical Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Artemis StamboulisSchool of Metallurgy and Materials, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Beryl OppenheimUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK.
Julie GoughSchool of Materials, University of Manchester, Manchester M1 7HS, UK.
Liam GroverSchool of Chemical Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Robert A H ScottRoyal Centre for Defence Medicine, Birmingham B15 2TH, UK.
Mark WebberInstitute of Microbiology and Infection, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Anna F A PeacockSchool of Chemistry, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Antonio BelliInstitute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Ann LoganInstitute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
Felicity de CoganInstitute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK f.decogan@bham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5083-7130

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council G18986Medical Research Council MR/J011584/1Medical Research Council MR/N019016/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interface between implanted devices and their host tissue is complex and is often optimized for maximal integration and cell adhesion. However, this also gives a surface suitable for bacterial colonization. We have developed a novel method of modifying the surface at the material-tissue interface with an antimicrobial peptide (AMP) coating to allow cell attachment while inhibiting bacterial colonization. The technology reported here is a dual AMP coating. The dual coating consists of AMPs covalently bonded to the hydroxyapatite surface, followed by deposition of electrostatically bound AMPs. The dual approach gives an efficacious coating which is stable for over 12 months and can prevent colonization of the surface by both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria.

Indexed as

Materials TestingAnimalsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesCell LineCoated Materials, BiocompatibleDurapatiteGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Positive BacteriaMiceOsteoblastsStatic ElectricityAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesCoated Materials, BiocompatibleDurapatiteantimicrobialdevice–tissue interfacesurface engineering

Identifiers

PMID28077764
PMCPMC5310730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.