Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28077741›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2017

Is Using a Latrine "A Strange Thing To Do"? A Mixed-Methods Study of Sanitation Preference and Behaviors in Rural Ethiopia.

Kristen Aiemjoy, Nicole E Stoller, Sintayehu Gebresillasie, Ayalew Shiferaw, Zerihun Tadesse, Tegene Sewent, Bezuayehu Ayele, Melsew Chanyalew, Solomon Aragie, Kelly Callahan and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Changing hygiene behaviours: a cluster-randomized trial, Ethiopia.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2021
    Trial
  4. Odour reduction interventions for simple pit latrines in rural Ethiopia: a randomized study.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2020
    Trial
  5. Effects of Community Health Improvement Process on Sanitary Latrine Usage in a Rural Village of Villupuram District, Tamil Nadu.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A Spatio-Temporal Pattern and Socio-Economic Factors Analysis of Improved Sanitation in China, 2006⁻2015.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Enabling Factors for Sustaining Open Defecation-Free Communities in Rural Indonesia: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Kristen AiemjoyFrancis I Proctor Foundation, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California. kristen.aiemjoy@ucsf.edu.
Nicole E StollerFrancis I Proctor Foundation, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Sintayehu GebresillasieFrancis I Proctor Foundation, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Ayalew ShiferawThe Carter Center, Atlanta, Georgia.
Zerihun TadesseThe Carter Center, Atlanta, Georgia.
Tegene SewentMichael Dejene Public Health Consultancy Services, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Bezuayehu AyeleMichael Dejene Public Health Consultancy Services, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Melsew ChanyalewAmhara Regional Health Bureau, Bahir-Dar, Ethiopia.
Solomon AragieThe Carter Center, Atlanta, Georgia.
Kelly CallahanThe Carter Center, Atlanta, Georgia.
Aisha StewartThe Carter Center, Atlanta, Georgia.
Paul M EmersonThe Taskforce for Global Health, Decatur, Georgia.
Thomas M LietmanFrancis I Proctor Foundation, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Jeremy D KeenanFrancis I Proctor Foundation, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Catherine E OldenburgFrancis I Proctor Foundation, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Carter Center · USSan Francisco Foundation · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USEthiopian Public Health Association · ETAmhara Regional Health Bureau · ETThe Task Force for Global Health · US

Funding

HIV and Other Infectious Consequences of Substance UseT32DA013911 · NIDA · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI TRACI C GREEN, JOSIAH D RICH · 2001 to 2026
$9.6M
TANA IIU10EY016214 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LIETMAN, THOMAS M · 2004 to 2013
$4.4M
The Brown Initiative in HIV and AIDS Clinical Research for Minority CommunitiesR25MH083620 · NIMH · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI NUNN, AMY STEWART · 2008 to 2025
$3.7M
NEI NIH HHS U10 EY016214NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA013911NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH083620
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Latrines are the most basic form of improved sanitation and are a common public health intervention. Understanding motivations for building and using latrines can help develop effective, sustainable latrine promotion programs. We conducted a mixed-methods study of latrine use in the Amhara region of Ethiopia. We held 15 focus group discussions and surveyed 278 households in five communities. We used the Integrated Behavioral Model for Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene interventions to guide our qualitative analysis. Seventy-one percent of households had a latrine, but coverage varied greatly across communities. Higher household income was not associated with latrine use (odds ratio [OR] = 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.5, 7.7); similarly, cost and availability of materials were not discussed as barriers to latrine use in the focus groups. Male-headed households were more likely to use latrines than households with female heads (OR = 3.5; 95% CI = 1.6, 7.7), and households with children in school were more likely to use latrines than households without children in school (OR = 2.3; 95% CI = 1.6, 3.3). These quantitative findings were confirmed in focus groups, where participants discussed how children relay health messages from school. Participants discussed how women prefer not to use latrines, often finding them strange or even scary. These findings are useful for public health implementation; they imply that community-level drivers are important predictors of household latrine use and that cost is not a significant barrier. These findings confirm that school-aged children may be effective conduits of health messages and suggest that latrines can be better marketed and designed for women.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorSanitationToilet FacilitiesAdolescentAdultAgedConstruction MaterialsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioSocioeconomic FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28077741
PMCPMC5239711
OpenAlexW2555506461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.