Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28077664›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2017

In monkeys making value-based decisions, amygdala neurons are sensitive to cue value as distinct from cue salience.

Marvin L Leathers, Carl R Olson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The amygdala and the pursuit of future rewards.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Neuronal Encoding of Emotional Valence and Intensity in the Monkey Amygdala.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  4. Contingent Amygdala Inputs Trigger Heterosynaptic LTP at Hippocampus-To-Accumbens Synapses.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Neuronal Activity in the Primate Amygdala during Economic Choice.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  8. Cognitive Control of Escape Behaviour.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marvin L LeathersCenter for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and marvin.leathers@nih.gov.
Carl R OlsonCenter for the Neural Basis of Cognition, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and.
Carnegie Mellon University · USCenter for the Neural Basis of Cognition · US

Funding

Virus Production and Manipulation of Protein/Gene Expression ModuleP30EY008098 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Marlene Behrmann · 1989 to 2026
$17.8M
Statistics and Data Management CoreP50MH103204 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI OLSON, CARL ROGER · 2014 to 2018
$10.8M
Prediction in Visual CortexR01EY024912 · NEI · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI OLSON, CARL ROGER · 2015 to 2018
$1.3M
Computational and Neural Mechanisms of Context Processing in SchizophreniaK08MH080329 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI CHO, RAYMOND Y · 2008 to 2012
$858k
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY008098NEI NIH HHS R01 EY024912NIMH NIH HHS K08 MH080329NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH103204
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurons in the lateral intraparietal (LIP) area of macaque monkey parietal cortex respond to cues predicting rewards and penalties of variable size in a manner that depends on the motivational salience of the predicted outcome (strong for both large reward and large penalty) rather than on its value (positive for large reward and negative for large penalty). This finding suggests that LIP mediates the capture of attention by salient events and does not encode value in the service of value-based decision making. It leaves open the question whether neurons elsewhere in the brain encode value in the identical task. To resolve this issue, we recorded neuronal activity in the amygdala in the context of the task employed in the LIP study. We found that responses to reward-predicting cues were similar between areas, with the majority of reward-sensitive neurons responding more strongly to cues that predicted large reward than to those that predicted small reward. Responses to penalty-predicting cues were, however, markedly different. In the amygdala, unlike LIP, few neurons were sensitive to penalty size, few penalty-sensitive neurons favored large over small penalty, and the dependence of firing rate on penalty size was negatively correlated with its dependence on reward size. These results indicate that amygdala neurons encoded cue value under circumstances in which LIP neurons exhibited sensitivity to motivational salience. However, the representation of negative value, as reflected in sensitivity to penalty size, was weaker than the representation of positive value, as reflected in sensitivity to reward size.

Indexed as

CuesRewardAction PotentialsAmygdalaAnalysis of VarianceAnimalsAttentionDecision MakingFemaleFunctional LateralityMacaca mulattaMaleNeuronsSaccadesamygdalamonkeypenaltyrewardvalue

Identifiers

PMID28077664
PMCPMC5376613
OpenAlexW2575169568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.