Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28077663›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2017

Temporally precise control of single-neuron spiking by juxtacellular nanostimulation.

Maik C Stüttgen, Lourens J P Nonkes, H Rüdiger A P Geis, Paul H Tiesinga, Arthur R Houweling

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Single-Cell Stimulation in Barrel Cortex Influences Psychophysical Detection Performance.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Maik C StüttgenDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; maik.stuettgen@uni-mainz.de.ORCID 0000-0002-7031-262X
Lourens J P NonkesDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
H Rüdiger A P GeisDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Paul H TiesingaDepartment of Neuroinformatics, Donders Centre for Neuroscience, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Arthur R HouwelingDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DERadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Temporal patterns of action potentials influence a variety of activity-dependent intra- and intercellular processes and play an important role in theories of neural coding. Elucidating the mechanisms underlying these phenomena requires imposing spike trains with precisely defined patterns, but this has been challenging due to the limitations of existing stimulation techniques. Here we present a new nanostimulation method providing control over the action potential output of individual cortical neurons. Spikes are elicited through the juxtacellular application of short-duration fluctuating currents ("kurzpulses"), allowing for the sub-millisecond precise and reproducible induction of arbitrary patterns of action potentials at all physiologically relevant firing frequencies (<120 Hz), including minute-long spike trains recorded in freely moving animals. We systematically compared our method to whole cell current injection, as well as optogenetic stimulation, and show that nanostimulation performance compares favorably with these techniques. This new nanostimulation approach is easily applied, can be readily performed in awake behaving animals, and thus promises to be a powerful tool for systematic investigations into the temporal elements of neural codes, as well as the mechanisms underlying a wide variety of activity-dependent cellular processes.

Indexed as

Models, Neurological6-Cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dioneAction PotentialsAnimalsBiophysicsCytoskeletal ProteinsElectric StimulationExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsFemaleLuminescent ProteinsMaleMiceMice, TransgenicNerve Tissue ProteinsNeuronsOptogenetics2-amino-5-phosphopentanoic acid6-Cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dioneactivity regulated cytoskeletal-associated proteinCytoskeletal ProteinsExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsLuminescent ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsSynapsinsValinejuxtacellular stimulationoptogenetics, cortexwhole cell

Identifiers

PMID28077663
PMCPMC5350268
OpenAlexW2574324288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.