Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28077613›Full record

ArticleThorax2017

Socioeconomic deprivation and the outcome of pulmonary rehabilitation in England and Wales.

Michael C Steiner, Derek Lowe, Katy Beckford, John Blakey, Charlotte E Bolton, Sarah Elkin, William D-C Man, C Michael Roberts, Louise Sewell, Paul Walker and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Thorax, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Equity in pulmonary rehabilitation delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Social determinants of advanced chronic respiratory interventions: a scoping review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. General practice management of COPD patients following acute exacerbations: a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Michael C SteinerLeicester Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, Institute for Lung Health, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.
Derek LoweClinical Effectiveness and Evaluation Unit, Royal College of Physicians of London, London, UK.
Katy BeckfordBerkshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Bracknell, UK.
John BlakeyLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine and Aintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Charlotte E BoltonNottingham Respiratory Research Unit, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Sarah ElkinImperial College NHS Trust and NHLI, Imperial College, London, UK.
William D-C ManNIHR Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial College, Harefield, UK.
C Michael RobertsBarts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Louise SewellSchool of Health, CWG17, Coventry University, Coventry, UK.
Paul WalkerAintree University Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Sally J SinghLeicester Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, Institute for Lung Health, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.

Funding

Department of Health CTF-01-12-04Department of Health DHCS/07/07/009Department of Health PB-PG-0213-30003Medical Research Council G1002113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPulmonary rehabilitation (PR) improves exercise capacity and health status in patients with COPD, but many patients assessed for PR do not complete therapy. It is unknown whether socioeconomic deprivation associates with rates of completion of PR or the magnitude of clinical benefits bequeathed by PR.

methodsPR services across England and Wales enrolled patients to the National PR audit in 2015. Deprivation was assessed using Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) derived from postcodes. Study outcomes were completion of therapy and change in measures of exercise performance and health status. Univariate and multivariate analyses investigated associations between IMD and these outcomes.

results210 PR programmes enrolled 7413 patients. Compared with the general population, the PR sample lived in relatively deprived neighbourhoods. There was a statistically significant association between rates of completion of PR and quintile of deprivation (70% in the least and 50% in the most deprived quintiles). After baseline adjustments, the risk ratio (95% CI) for patients in the most deprived relative to the least deprived quintile was 0.79 (0.73 to 0.85), p<0.001. After baseline adjustments, IMD was not significantly associated with improvements in exercise performance and health status.

conclusionsIn a large national dataset, we have shown that patients living in more deprived areas are less likely to complete PR. However, deprivation was not associated with clinical outcomes in patients who complete therapy. Interventions targeted at enhancing referral, uptake and completion of PR among patients living in deprived areas could reduce morbidity and healthcare costs in such hard-to-reach populations.

Indexed as

Poverty AreasAgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionComorbidityEnglandExercise TestExercise ToleranceFemaleForced Expiratory VolumeHealth StatusHumansMaleMedical AuditMiddle AgedPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveCOPD epidemiologyPulmonary Rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID28077613
PMCPMC5520271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.