Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28077466›Full record

ArticleHeart (British Cardiac Society)2017

Tea consumption and risk of ischaemic heart disease.

Xia Li, Canqing Yu, Yu Guo, Zheng Bian, Jiahui Si, Ling Yang, Yiping Chen, Xiaolan Ren, Ge Jiang, Junshi Chen and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. PARP-1-Associated Pathological Processes: Inhibition by Natural Polyphenols.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Xia LiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.
Canqing YuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.
Yu GuoChinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zheng BianChinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jiahui SiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.
Ling YangClinical Trial Service Unit & Epidemiological Studies Unit (CTSU), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Yiping ChenClinical Trial Service Unit & Epidemiological Studies Unit (CTSU), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Xiaolan RenGansu Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Lanzhou, China.
Ge JiangHeilongjiang Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Harbin, China.
Junshi ChenChina National Center for Food Safety Risk Assessment, Beijing, China.
Zhengming ChenClinical Trial Service Unit & Epidemiological Studies Unit (CTSU), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Jun LvDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.
Liming LiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.
China Kadoorie Biobank Collaborative Group
Peking University · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNUniversity of Oxford · GBChina National Center for Food Safety Risk Assessment · CNGansu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNHeilongjiang Center for Tuberculosis Control and Prevention · CN

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_12026/2Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo prospectively examine the association between tea consumption and the risk of ischaemic heart disease (IHD).

methodsProspective study using the China Kadoorie Biobank; participants from 10 areas across China were enrolled during 2004-2008 and followed up until 31 December 2013. After excluding participants with cancer, heart disease and stroke at baseline, the present study included 199 293 men and 288 082 women aged 30-79 years at baseline. Information on IHD incidence was collected through disease registries and the new national health insurance databases.

resultsDuring a median follow-up of 7.2 years, we documented 24 665 (7.19 cases/1000 person-years) incident IHD cases and 3959 (1.13 cases/1000 person-years) major coronary events (MCEs). Tea consumption was associated with reduced risk of IHD and MCE. In the whole cohort, compared with participants who never consumed tea during the past 12 months, the multivariable-adjusted HRs and 95% CIs for less than daily and daily tea consumers were 0.97 (0.94 to 1.00) and 0.92 (0.88 to 0.95) for IHD, 0.92 (0.85 to 1.00) and 0.90 (0.82 to 0.99) for MCE. No linear trends in the HRs across the amount of tea were observed in daily consumers for IHD and MCE (P

conclusionsIn this large prospective study, daily tea consumption was associated with a reduced risk of IHD.

Indexed as

TeaAdultAgedChinaDrinking BehaviorFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial IschemiaProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentRural PopulationTime FactorsTea

Identifiers

PMID28077466
PMCPMC5529974
OpenAlexW2575750846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.