Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28077411›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

Incidence of surgical site infection following caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

Khalid B M Saeed, Richard A Greene, Paul Corcoran, Sinéad M O'Neill

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05920122 (A Randomized Control Trial of Chlorhexidine Gluconate Aqueous Solution vs Chlorhexidine Gluconate With Isopropyl Alcohol Skin Preparations for Prevention of Cesarean Section Wound Infections), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05920122 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Control Trial of Chlorhexidine Gluconate Aqueous Solution vs Chlorhexidine Gluconate With Isopropyl Alcohol Skin Preparations for Prevention of Cesarean Section Wound Infections

TypeinterventionalSponsorHyagriv SimhanRan2023 to 2025Enrolled1,398ConditionsSurgical Site Infection, Cesarean Section, InfectionArms2% Chlorhexidine gluconate with 70% alcohol, 4% Chlorhexidine Gluconate aqueous solution
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Assessment of Coffee Consumption on Post-Cesarean Section Bowel Movements.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Single-use negative pressure wound therapy to prevent surgical site complications in high-risk patients undergoing caesarean sections: a real-world study.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2023
    Observational
  10. Identifying Soccer Players' Playing Styles: A Systematic Review.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Khalid B M SaeedDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-2676-520X
Richard A GreeneCork University Maternity Hospital, Cork, Ireland.
Paul CorcoranDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National Perinatal Epidemiology Centre, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Sinéad M O'NeillINFANT: Irish Centre for Fetal and Neonatal Translational Research, Cork University Maternity Hospital, Cork, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCaesarean section (CS) rates have increased globally during the past three decades. Surgical site infection (SSI) following CS is a common cause of morbidity with reported rates of 3-15%. SSI represents a substantial burden to the health system including increased length of hospitalisation and costs of postdischarge care. The definition of SSI varies with the postoperative follow-up period among different health systems, resulting in differences in the reporting of SSI incidence. We propose to conduct the first systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the pooled estimate for the overall incidence of SSI following CS. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will perform a comprehensive search to identify all potentially relevant published studies on the incidence of SSI following CS reported from 1992 in the English language. Electronic databases including PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE and Scopus will be searched using a detailed search strategy. Following study selection, full-text paper retrieval, data extraction and synthesis, we will appraise study quality and risk of bias and assess heterogeneity. Incidence data will be combined where feasible in a meta-analysis using Stata software and fixed-effects or random-effects models as appropriate. This systematic review will be reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required as this review will use published data. The review will evaluate the overall incidence of SSI following CS and will provide the first quantitative estimate of the magnitude of SSI. It will serve as a benchmark for future studies, identify research gaps and remaining challenges, and emphasise the need for appropriate prevention and control measures for SSI post-CS. A manuscript reporting the results of the systematic review and meta-analysis will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and presented at scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42015024426.

Indexed as

AdultCesarean SectionFemaleHumansIncidenceMeta-Analysis as TopicPopulation SurveillancePregnancyQualitative ResearchRisk FactorsSurgical Wound InfectionSystematic Reviews as TopicCaesarean Section; Incidence; Pregnancy; Surgical Site Infection; meta-analysis, Systematic reviewEPIDEMIOLOGYOBSTETRICS

Identifiers

PMID28077411
PMCPMC5253548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.