ArticleBMJ open2017
Incidence of surgical site infection following caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05920122 (A Randomized Control Trial of Chlorhexidine Gluconate Aqueous Solution vs Chlorhexidine Gluconate With Isopropyl Alcohol Skin Preparations for Prevention of Cesarean Section Wound Infections), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized Control Trial of Chlorhexidine Gluconate Aqueous Solution vs Chlorhexidine Gluconate With Isopropyl Alcohol Skin Preparations for Prevention of Cesarean Section Wound Infections
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- Magnitude and Associated Factors of Surgical Site Infection Following Cesarean Section: A Cross-Sectional Study in Southern Ethiopia.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Surgical Solution of C-Section Associated Surgical Site Infection in LMICs: A Narrative Review.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Review
- THE BURDEN OF POST-CAESAREAN SECTION WOUND COMPLICATIONS IN A TEACHING HOSPITAL IN SOUTHEAST NIGERIA.Annals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine · 2025Article
- The Incidence and Risk Factors of Surgical Site Infection Following Cesarean Section.Nursing research and practice · 2025Article
- Assessment of Coffee Consumption on Post-Cesarean Section Bowel Movements.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2024Article
- Impact of Early Dressing Removal After Cesarean Section on Wound Healing and Complications: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- The Impact of an Evidence-Based Bundle on Cesarean Section-Related Surgical Site Infections: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.) · 2024Article
- Evaluation of independent risk factors associated with surgical site infections from caesarean section.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2023Article
- Single-use negative pressure wound therapy to prevent surgical site complications in high-risk patients undergoing caesarean sections: a real-world study.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2023Observational
- Identifying Soccer Players' Playing Styles: A Systematic Review.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2023Review
- Article
- Predictors of surgical site infection among women following cesarean delivery in eastern Ethiopia: a prospective cohort study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023Article
- Medical-Grade Honey Enhances the Healing of Caesarean Section Wounds and Is Similarly Effective to Antibiotics Combined with Povidone-Iodine in the Prevention of Infections-A Prospective Cohort Study.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Telemedicine for Surgical Site Infection Diagnosis in Rural Rwanda: Concordance and Accuracy of Image Reviews.World journal of surgery · 2022Article
- Does a Healthy Lifestyle Lower the Elevated Risk of Obesity Caused by Caesarian Section Delivery in Children and Adolescents?Nutrients · 2022Article
- mHealth-community health worker telemedicine intervention for surgical site infection diagnosis: a prospective study among women delivering via caesarean section in rural Rwanda.BMJ global health · 2022Article
- Surgical site infections following caesarean sections in the largest teaching hospital in Ghana.Infection prevention in practice · 2022Article
- Embedding evidence of early postoperative off-bed activities and rehabilitation in a real clinical setting in China: an interrupted time-series study.BMC nursing · 2022Article
- Incidence, risk factors and management of post cesarean section surgical site infection (SSI) in a tertiary hospital in Egypt: a five year retrospective study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2021Observational
- Surgical site infection and its association with rupture of membrane following cesarean section in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies.Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCaesarean section (CS) rates have increased globally during the past three decades. Surgical site infection (SSI) following CS is a common cause of morbidity with reported rates of 3-15%. SSI represents a substantial burden to the health system including increased length of hospitalisation and costs of postdischarge care. The definition of SSI varies with the postoperative follow-up period among different health systems, resulting in differences in the reporting of SSI incidence. We propose to conduct the first systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the pooled estimate for the overall incidence of SSI following CS. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will perform a comprehensive search to identify all potentially relevant published studies on the incidence of SSI following CS reported from 1992 in the English language. Electronic databases including PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE and Scopus will be searched using a detailed search strategy. Following study selection, full-text paper retrieval, data extraction and synthesis, we will appraise study quality and risk of bias and assess heterogeneity. Incidence data will be combined where feasible in a meta-analysis using Stata software and fixed-effects or random-effects models as appropriate. This systematic review will be reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required as this review will use published data. The review will evaluate the overall incidence of SSI following CS and will provide the first quantitative estimate of the magnitude of SSI. It will serve as a benchmark for future studies, identify research gaps and remaining challenges, and emphasise the need for appropriate prevention and control measures for SSI post-CS. A manuscript reporting the results of the systematic review and meta-analysis will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and presented at scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42015024426.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.