Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28077409›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

Have health inequalities changed during childhood in the New Labour generation? Findings from the UK Millennium Cohort Study.

Emeline Rougeaux, Steven Hope, Catherine Law, Anna Pearce

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pathways to inequalities in child health.Archives of disease in childhood · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Poverty, Weight Status, and Dietary Intake among UK Adolescents.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emeline RougeauxDepartment of Population Policy and Practice, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Steven HopeDepartment of Population Policy and Practice, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Catherine LawDepartment of Population Policy and Practice, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Anna PearceDepartment of Population Policy and Practice, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.

Funding

Department of Health [UK]Medical Research Council MR/J012351/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo examine how population-level socioeconomic health inequalities developed during childhood, for children born at the turn of the 21st century and who grew up with major initiatives to tackle health inequalities (under the New Labour Government).

settingThe UK.

participantsSingleton children in the Millennium Cohort Study at ages 3 (n=15 381), 5 (n=15 041), 7 (n=13 681) and 11 (n=13 112) years. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: Relative (prevalence ratios (PR)) and absolute health inequalities (prevalence differences (PD)) were estimated in longitudinal models by socioeconomic circumstances (SEC; using highest maternal academic attainment, ranging from 'no academic qualifications' to 'degree' (baseline)). Three health outcomes were examined: overweight (including obesity), limiting long-standing illness (LLSI), and socio-emotional difficulties (SED).

resultsRelative and absolute inequalities in overweight, across the social gradient, emerged by age 5 and increased with age. By age 11, children with mothers who had no academic qualifications were considerably more likely to be overweight as compared with those with degree-educated mothers (PR=1.6 (95% CI 1.4 to 1.8), PD=12.9% (9.1% to 16.8%)). For LLSI, inequalities emerged by age 7 and remained at 11, but only for children whose mothers had no academic qualifications (PR=1.7 (1.3 to 2.3), PD=4.8% (2% to 7.5%)). Inequalities in SED (observed across the social gradient and at all ages) declined between 3 and 11, although remained large at 11 (eg, PR=2.4 (1.9 to 2.9), PD=13.4% (10.2% to 16.7%) comparing children whose mothers had no academic qualifications with those of degree-educated mothers).

conclusionsAlthough health inequalities have been well documented in cross-sectional and trend data in the UK, it is less clear how they develop during childhood. We found that relative and absolute health inequalities persisted, and in some cases widened, for a cohort of children born at the turn of the century. Further research examining and comparing the pathways through which SECs influence health may further our understanding of how inequalities could be prevented in future generations of children.

Indexed as

Health Care ReformHealth Status DisparitiesMothersAdolescentAdultBreast FeedingChildCross-Sectional StudiesEducational StatusFamily CharacteristicsFemaleHealth StatusHumansLongitudinal StudiesMalePediatric ObesityCHILD HEALTHCOHORTINEQUALITIESLIFECOURSE EPIDEMIOLOGYPOLICY

Identifiers

PMID28077409
PMCPMC5253527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.