Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28077403›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2018

Gene co-expression analysis for functional classification and gene-disease predictions.

Sipko van Dam, Urmo Võsa, Adriaan van der Graaf, Lude Franke, João Pedro de Magalhães

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 602 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
602citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

602 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Variable expression ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

542 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sipko van DamDepartment of Genetics, UMCG HPC CB50, RB Groningen, Netherlands.
Urmo VõsaDepartment of Genetics, UMCG HPC CB50, RB Groningen, Netherlands.
Adriaan van der GraafDepartment of Genetics, UMCG HPC CB50, RB Groningen, Netherlands.
Lude FrankeDepartment of Genetics, UMCG HPC CB50, RB Groningen, Netherlands.
João Pedro de MagalhãesInstitute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K016741/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene co-expression networks can be used to associate genes of unknown function with biological processes, to prioritize candidate disease genes or to discern transcriptional regulatory programmes. With recent advances in transcriptomics and next-generation sequencing, co-expression networks constructed from RNA sequencing data also enable the inference of functions and disease associations for non-coding genes and splice variants. Although gene co-expression networks typically do not provide information about causality, emerging methods for differential co-expression analysis are enabling the identification of regulatory genes underlying various phenotypes. Here, we introduce and guide researchers through a (differential) co-expression analysis. We provide an overview of methods and tools used to create and analyse co-expression networks constructed from gene expression data, and we explain how these can be used to identify genes with a regulatory role in disease. Furthermore, we discuss the integration of other data types with co-expression networks and offer future perspectives of co-expression analysis.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationGene Regulatory NetworksComputational BiologyDiseaseGene Expression ProfilingGenesHumansPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID28077403
PMCPMC6054162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.