Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28077385›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2017

Impact of Sex and Contact-to-Device Time on Clinical Outcomes in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction-Findings From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.

Robert O Roswell, Jordan Kunkes, Anita Y Chen, Karen Chiswell, Sohah Iqbal, Matthew T Roe, Sripal Bangalore

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Intra-aortic Balloon Pump Utilization Prior to Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Social Determinants of Health.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Article
  4. Redesigning medicine: integrating sex and gender for better health outcomes.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Feedback Loop Failure Modes in Medical Diagnosis: How Biases Can Emerge and Be Reinforced.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Sex Differences in Heart Failure: What Do We Know?Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Sex differences in time to primary percutaneous coronary intervention and outcomes in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Robert O RoswellDepartment of Medicine, Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY robert.roswell@nyumc.org.
Jordan KunkesDepartment of Medicine, Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY.
Anita Y ChenDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC.
Karen ChiswellDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC.
Sohah IqbalDepartment of Medicine, Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY.
Matthew T RoeDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC.
Sripal BangaloreDepartment of Medicine, Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY.
New York University · USClinical Research Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmergent myocardial reperfusion via primary percutaneous coronary intervention is optimal care for patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Delays in such interventions are associated with increases in mortality. With the shift in focus to contact-to-device (C2D) time as a new perfusion metric, this study was designed to examine how sex affects C2D time and mortality in STEMI patients. METHODS AND

resultsClinical data on male and female STEMI patients were extracted and analyzed from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry from July 1, 2008 to December 31, 2014. A total of 102 515 patients were included in the final analytic cohort. The median C2D time in female patients with STEMI was delayed when compared to male patients (80 [65-97] versus 75 [61-90] minutes; P<0.001). The unadjusted mortality was higher in female patients when compared to male patients with STEMI (4.1% versus 2.0%; P<0.001). For every 5-minute increase in C2D time, the adjusted odds ratio for mortality was 1.04 (95% CI, 1.03-1.06) for female patients with STEMI and 1.07 (95% CI, 1.06-1.09) for male patients (P for sex by C2D interaction=0.003).

conclusionsTo date, this is the largest analysis of STEMI patients that measures the impact of the new recommended C2D reperfusion metric on in-hospital mortality. Female STEMI patients have longer C2D times and increased mortality. The disparity can be improved and survival can increase in this high-risk patient cohort by decreasing systems issues that cause increased reperfusion times in female STEMI patients.

Indexed as

Hospital MortalityPercutaneous Coronary InterventionRegistriesAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMortalityOdds RatioRetrospective StudiesSex FactorsST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionTime-to-TreatmentTreatment Outcomedisparitiesmortalityreperfusionsex‐specificST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID28077385
PMCPMC5523636
OpenAlexW2578937063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.