Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28077359›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2017

Indoor Tanning and Melanoma Risk: Long-Term Evidence From a Prospective Population-Based Cohort Study.

Reza Ghiasvand, Corina S Rueegg, Elisabete Weiderpass, Adele C Green, Eiliv Lund, Marit B Veierød

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A systematic review of microsimulation models for skin cancer.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Melanoma incidence in Norway, 1980-2024: a cohort study.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026
    Article
  3. Molecular effects of indoor tanning.Science advances · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Melanoma crash course.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review: The Key Factors to Melanomagenesis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Reza GhiasvandOslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Blindern,Oslo, Norway.
Corina S RueeggDepartment of Biostatistics, Oslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Elisabete WeiderpassDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Adele C GreenQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Cancer and Population studies, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; CRUK Manchester Institute and University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Eiliv LundDepartment of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Marit B VeierødOslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Norway.

Funding

Medical Research Council G0802468
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indoor tanning is associated with increased risk of melanoma, but most evidence comes from case-control studies. Using data from the Norwegian Women and Cancer Study, a large prospective cohort study, we investigated the associations of age at initiation of indoor tanning, duration of tanning-device use, and dose response with melanoma risk and examined the role of indoor tanning in age at melanoma diagnosis. We used Poisson regression to estimate relative risks and 95% confidence intervals for the relationship of indoor tanning to melanoma risk and linear regression to examine age of indoor tanning initiation in relation to age at diagnosis. During follow-up of 141,045 women (1991-2012; mean duration follow-up = 13.7 years), 861 women were diagnosed with melanoma. Melanoma risk increased with increasing cumulative number of tanning sessions (for highest tertile of use vs. never use, adjusted relative risk = 1.32, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.08, 1.63); P-trend = 0.006. Age at initiation <30 years was associated with a higher risk in comparison with never use (adjusted relative risk = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.59). Moreover, women who started indoor tanning prior to 30 years of age were 2.2 years (95% CI: 0.9, 3.4) younger at diagnosis, on average, than never users. This cohort study provides strong evidence of a dose-response association between indoor tanning and risk of melanoma and supports the hypothesis that vulnerability to the harmful effects of indoor tanning is greater at a younger age.

Indexed as

SunbathingAdultAgedAge of OnsetFemaleHumansMelanomaMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSkin Neoplasmscohort studiesindoor tanningmelanomaNorwayprospective studiestanning bedsultraviolet radiation

Identifiers

PMID28077359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.