ReviewLancet (London, England)2017
Evidence for overuse of medical services around the world.
Review in Lancet (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 434 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Consequences of Doing What Should Not be Done in Primary Care
Reducing Empiric VAncomycin Use in Pediatric Suspected Sepsis (REVAMP-Sepsis)
Who cites it
434 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence for prediction of clinical response and therapeutic value in interventional pain management: a scoping review.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations in Clinical Nursing Practices.Journal of nursing management · 2024Pooled it
- Health outcomes in primary care: a 20-year evidence map of randomized controlled trials.Family practice · 2023Pooled it
- A systematic review defining non-beneficial and inappropriate end-of-life treatment in patients with non-cancer diagnoses: theoretical development for multi-stakeholder intervention design in acute care settings.BMC palliative care · 2022Pooled it
- Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Process Evaluation of Teaching Critical Thinking About Health Using the Informed Health Choices Intervention in Uganda: A Mixed Methods Study.Global health, science and practice · 2024Trial
- Acetylcholine and noradrenaline enhance foraging optimality in humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Trial
- Implementing an audit and feedback cycle to improve adherence to the Choosing Wisely Canada recommendations: clustered randomized trail.BMC primary care · 2022Trial
- Healthcare consumption among patients with stress-related exhaustion: a register-based study in Swedish primary care.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2026Article
- Observational
- Global under- and overprescribing of drugs-a scoping review.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Review
- [Set them free! Better care for more patients with fewer follow-ups].Die Ophthalmologie · 2026Review
- The Effect of Pairing Assistance Under Medical Alliance Policy on Healthcare Utilization for Patients With Chronic Diseases in Rural China.The International journal of health planning and management · 2026Article
- [Distributive justice in healthcare during times of change: a medical ethics perspective].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Drivers and potential mitigation solutions for low-value medical imaging in Iran: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Otolaryngology Involvement in Emergency Care for Dizziness During the 2024 Korean Resident Physician Workforce Disruption and Subsequent Return: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Digital Patient-Controlled Follow-Up in Palliative Cancer Care: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Feasibility Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Elective admissions and treatments in the final three months of life: a nationwide retrospective study of older adults.European geriatric medicine · 2026Article
374 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Overuse, which is defined as the provision of medical services that are more likely to cause harm than good, is a pervasive problem. Direct measurement of overuse through documentation of delivery of inappropriate services is challenging given the difficulty of defining appropriate care for patients with individual preferences and needs; overuse can also be measured indirectly through examination of unwarranted geographical variations in prevalence of procedures and care intensity. Despite the challenges, the high prevalence of overuse is well documented in high-income countries across a wide range of services and is increasingly recognised in low-income countries. Overuse of unneeded services can harm patients physically and psychologically, and can harm health systems by wasting resources and deflecting investments in both public health and social spending, which is known to contribute to health. Although harms from overuse have not been well quantified and trends have not been well described, overuse is likely to be increasing worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.