ReviewLancet (London, England)2017
Evidence for underuse of effective medical services around the world.
Review in Lancet (London, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 133 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
133 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Implementation of healthcare guidelines in public health: an umbrella review.BMC public health · 2026Pooled it
- Systematic review of the quality of care provided to sick children in Ethiopian health facilities.Journal of global health · 2024Pooled it
- Applying a framework to assess the impact of cardiovascular outcomes improvement research.Health research policy and systems · 2021Pooled it
- Strengthening tRansparent reporting of reseArch on uNfinished nursing CARE: The RANCARE guideline.Research in nursing & health · 2021Guideline
- Quality of information in news media reports about the effects of health interventions: Systematic review and meta-analyses.F1000Research · 2021Pooled it
- How to do (or not to do) … using the standardized patient method to measure clinical quality of care in LMIC health facilities.Health policy and planning · 2019Pooled it
- Determinants of the overuse of imaging in low-risk prostate cancer: A systematic review.Urologic oncology · 2017Pooled it
- Health professionals' views on the barriers and enablers to evidence-based practice for acute stroke care: a systematic review.Implementation science : IS · 2017Pooled it
- Multiple Suggested Care Alternatives and Decision-Making of Primary Care Physicians: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Process Evaluation of Teaching Critical Thinking About Health Using the Informed Health Choices Intervention in Uganda: A Mixed Methods Study.Global health, science and practice · 2024Trial
- Comparing the effectiveness of 3D printing technology in the treatment of clavicular fracture between surgeons with different experiences.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Trial
- Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Intramuscular and Oral Betamethasone and Dexamethasone in Reproductive Age Women in India.Clinical and translational science · 2020Trial
- Trial
- Using evidence briefs to support future implementation planning: the case of early fibrinolysis for myocardial infarction and rehabilitation for the amputee patient in Colombia.Health research policy and systems · 2026Article
- A roadmap for developing a program to self-manage post-traumatic knee osteoarthritis risk.Osteoarthritis and cartilage open · 2026Article
- Determinants of out-of-pocket expenditures amongst cancer patients undergoing modern radiotherapy modalities in public healthcare facilities of Tamil Nadu, South India.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- AI Methods for Implementation Science (AIM-IS): developing a framework, toolkit, and reporting standard for the responsible use of AI in implementation practice and research.Implementation science : IS · 2026Article
- EcoRxAgent: an AI agent for generating economically substitutable prescriptions.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
73 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Underuse-the failure to use effective and affordable medical interventions-is common and responsible for substantial suffering, disability, and loss of life worldwide. Underuse occurs at every point along the treatment continuum, from populations lacking access to health care to inadequate supply of medical resources and labour, slow or partial uptake of innovations, and patients not accessing or declining them. The extent of underuse for different interventions varies by country, and is documented in countries of high, middle, and low-income, and across different types of health-care systems, payment models, and health services. Most research into underuse has focused on measuring solutions to the problem, with considerably less attention paid to its global prevalence or its consequences for patients and populations. Although focused effort and resources can overcome specific underuse problems, comparatively little is spent on work to better understand and overcome the barriers to improved uptake of effective interventions, and methods to make them affordable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28077232What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.