Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28077212›Full record

ArticleCortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior2017

Decoding the content of recollection within the core recollection network and beyond.

Preston P Thakral, Tracy H Wang, Michael D Rugg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mnemonic But Not Contextual Feedback Signals Defy Dedifferentiation in the Aging Early Visual Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Remembering past challenges to feel better today: Role of neural dedifferentiation and autobiographical integration in late-life reappraisal.Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Preston P ThakralDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, USA. Electronic address: prestonthakral@fas.harvard.edu.
Tracy H WangDepartment of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, USA.
Michael D RuggCenter for Vital Longevity and School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, University of Texas at Dallas, USA.

Funding

Retrieval Processing in Human Memory: ERP and Fmri InvestigationsR01MH072966 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI RUGG, MICHAEL D · 2005 to 2014
$3.3M
Relationship Between Neural Correlates of Episodic Memory,Age, Memory PerformanceRF1AG039103 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI RUGG, MICHAEL D · 2017 to 2017
$2.7M
Relationship Between Neural Correlates of Episodic Memory,Age, Memory PerformancR01AG039103 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI RUGG, MICHAEL D · 2011 to 2015
$1.5M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG039103NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG039103NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH072966
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recollection - retrieval of qualitative information about a past event - is associated with enhanced neural activity in a consistent set of neural regions (the 'core recollection network') seemingly regardless of the nature of the recollected content. Here, we employed multi-voxel pattern analysis (MVPA) to assess whether retrieval-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) activity in core recollection regions - including the hippocampus, angular gyrus, medial prefrontal cortex, retrosplenial/posterior cingulate cortex, and middle temporal gyrus - contain information about studied content and thus demonstrate retrieval-related 'reinstatement' effects. During study, participants viewed objects and concrete words that were subjected to different encoding tasks. Test items included studied words, the names of studied objects, or unstudied words. Participants judged whether the items were recollected, familiar, or new by making 'remember', 'know', and 'new' responses, respectively. The study history of remembered test items could be reliably decoded using MVPA in most regions, as well as from the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, a region where univariate recollection effects could not be detected. The findings add to evidence that members of the core recollection network, as well as at least one neural region where mean signal is insensitive to recollection success, carry information about recollected content. Importantly, the study history of recognized items endorsed with a 'know' response could be decoded with equal accuracy. The results thus demonstrate a striking dissociation between mean signal and multi-voxel indices of recollection. Moreover, they converge with prior findings in suggesting that, as it is operationalized by classification-based MVPA, reinstatement is not uniquely a signature of recollection.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBrainBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMental RecallMiddle AgedNerve NetPhotic StimulationReaction TimeRecognition, PsychologyYoung AdultEpisodic memoryKnowMVPAReinstatementRemember

Identifiers

PMID28077212
PMCPMC5446805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.