Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28077199›Full record

SynthesisPublic health nutrition2017

Legume consumption and CVD risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Stefano Marventano, Maria Izquierdo Pulido, Claudia Sánchez-González, Justyna Godos, Attilio Speciani, Fabio Galvano, Giuseppe Grosso

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Public health nutrition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. [WHO guideline on carbohydrate intake for adults and children].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2024
    Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Do Common Beans (Nutrients · 2021
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Stefano Marventano1Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies 'G.F. Ingrassia',Section of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine,University of Catania,Via S. Sofia 87,95123 Catania,Italy.
Maria Izquierdo Pulido2Departamento de Nutrición y Bromatología,Universidad de Barcelona,Barcelona,Spain.
Claudia Sánchez-González4Departamento de Biotecnología y Alimentos,Escuela de Ingeniería y Ciencias,Tecnológico de Monterrey,Monterrey,Mexico.
Justyna Godos5Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences,Section of Pharmacology and Biochemistry,University of Catania,Catania,Italy.
Attilio Speciani6Department of Food and Nutrition,Inflammation Society,London,UK.
Fabio Galvano5Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences,Section of Pharmacology and Biochemistry,University of Catania,Catania,Italy.
Giuseppe Grosso7Integrated Cancer Registry of Catania-Messina-Siracusa-Enna,Catania,Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of the present study was to systematically review and perform a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies exploring the association between dietary legume consumption and CVD risk, including CHD and stroke.

designThe PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched up to December 2015. A meta-analysis of the highest v. lowest (reference) category of dietary legume consumption was performed through random-effects models.

resultsFourteen studies conducted on eleven cohorts and accounting for a total of 367 000 individuals and 18 475 cases of CVD (7451 CHD and 6336 stroke cases) were considered for the analyses. Compared with lower legume consumption, the highest category of exposure was associated with a decreased risk of 10 % in both CVD and CHD (relative risk=0·90; 95 % CI 0·84, 0·97) with no or little evidence of heterogeneity and no publication bias. Null results were found regarding legume consumption and stroke risk. No substantial confounding factors were evident in stratified analyses.

conclusionsLegume consumption was associated with lower risk of CVD. Legumes' intrinsic characteristics, because they are often part of an overall healthy diet, or because they are a substitute for unhealthy sources of protein may potentially explain the current findings.

Indexed as

EatingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCardiovascular DiseasesCoronary DiseaseDietFabaceaeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk FactorsStrokeCVDFibreLegumesMeta-analysisMortality

Identifiers

PMID28077199
PMCPMC10261324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.