Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28077141›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2017

Determinants of and socio-economic disparities in self-rated health in China.

Jiaoli Cai, Peter C Coyte, Hongzhong Zhao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Do institutions matter for citizens' health status? Empirical evidence from Italy.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) of People over 65 Years of Age.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jiaoli CaiSchool of Economics, Wuhan University of Technology, 122 Luoshi Road, Wuhan, Hubei Province, 430070, People's Republic of China. jiaoli.cai@mail.utoronto.ca.
Peter C CoyteInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Health Sciences Building,155 College Street, Suite 425, Toronto, ON, M5T 3M6, Canada.
Hongzhong ZhaoSchool of Economics, Wuhan University of Technology, 122 Luoshi Road, Wuhan, Hubei Province, 430070, People's Republic of China.
Wuhan University of Technology · CNUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelf-rated health (SRH) is not only used to measure health status and health inequalities, but also as a strong predictor of morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to: 1) evaluate the factors that account for variations in self-rated health among Chinese citizens; and to 2) explore the process through which socio-economic status may impact self-rated health.

methodsData were derived from the Chinese General Social Survey (CGSS) (2013). Determinants of self-rated health were analyzed along four main dimensions: demographic characteristics, socio-economic status, lifestyle, and psychosocial factors. Multivariate odds ratios for good self-rated health were calculated for different variables in order to analyze the determinants. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the extent to which lifestyle and psychosocial factors explained the association between socio-economic status and self-rated health.

resultsAbout 65% of the survey respondents reported good self-rated health. Women, the elderly, married or single respondents and residents of Western China were less likely to report good self-rated health. Respondents who were engaged in work, had higher household income, reported high social class and higher socio-economic status compared with peers were more likely to report good self-rated health. Normal weight and physically active respondents along with those reporting a happy life, no depression, and good relationships with families and friends were related to good self-rated health. We also found the effect of socio-economic status on self-rated health was partly explained by lifestyle and psychosocial factors.

conclusionThe present findings support the notion that both socio-economic status and lifestyle as well as psychosocial factors were related with good self-rated health. The interventions targeting these factors could improve the health status of the population. The depression was the most influential predictor of self-rated health, especially for the women and the elderly. Although lifestyle and psychosocial factors explained partly the the association between socio-economic status and health, the reason why socio-economic difference exists in health must be further explored. What's more, it needs to be further studied why the same determinant has different influence strengths on the health of different groups of people.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Self EvaluationHealth Status DisparitiesAdolescentAdultAgedChinaFemaleHealth SurveysHumansLife StyleMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsYoung AdultChinaLifestylePsychosocial factorsSelf-rated healthSocio-economic status

Identifiers

PMID28077141
PMCPMC5225569
OpenAlexW2568293282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.