ArticleBMC medical ethics2017
Navigating social and ethical challenges of biobanking for human microbiome research.
Article in BMC medical ethics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microbes, mood, and metabolism/obesity: Pharmacological insights into the gut-obesity-depression triad.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026Review
- Harnessing Microbiome, Bacterial Extracellular Vesicle, and Artificial Intelligence for Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Diagnosis and Management.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Exploring the Frontier: The Human Microbiome's Role in Rare Childhood Neurological Diseases and Epilepsy.Brain sciences · 2024Review
- The potential of including the microbiome as biomarker in population-based health studies: methods and benefits.Frontiers in public health · 2024Review
- A comprehensive overview of microbiome data in the light of machine learning applications: categorization, accessibility, and future directions.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- Realising respiratory microbiomic meta-analyses: time for a standardised framework.Microbiome · 2023Article
- Ethical challenges in conducting and the clinical application of human microbiome research.Journal of medical ethics and history of medicine · 2023Article
- A comprehensive approach to stool donor screening for faecal microbiota transplantation in China.Microbial cell factories · 2021Article
- Article
- A framework for microbiome science in public health.Nature medicine · 2021Review
- Knowledge, attitudes, ethical and social perspectives towards fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) among Jordanian healthcare providers.BMC medical ethics · 2021Observational
- Framing the discussion of microorganisms as a facet of social equity in human health.PLoS biology · 2019Article
- Help, hope and hype: ethical considerations of human microbiome research and applications.Protein & cell · 2018Article
- A large-scale survey of the postmortem human microbiome, and its potential to provide insight into the living health condition.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Ethical Considerations in Microbial Therapeutic Clinical Trials.The New bioethics : a multidisciplinary journal of biotechnology and the body · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBiobanks are considered to be key infrastructures for research development and have generated a lot of debate about their ethical, legal and social implications (ELSI). While the focus has been on human genomic research, rapid advances in human microbiome research further complicate the debate. DISCUSSION: We draw on two cystic fibrosis biobanks in Toronto, Canada, to illustrate our points. The biobanks have been established to facilitate sample and data sharing for research into the link between disease progression and microbial dynamics in the lungs of pediatric and adult patients. We begin by providing an overview of some of the ELSI associated with human microbiome research, particularly on the implications for the broader society. We then discuss ethical considerations regarding the identifiability of samples biobanked for human microbiome research, and examine the issue of return of results and incidental findings. We argue that, for the purposes of research ethics oversight, human microbiome research samples should be treated with the same privacy considerations as human tissues samples. We also suggest that returning individual microbiome-related findings could provide a powerful clinical tool for care management, but highlight the need for a more grounded understanding of contextual factors that may be unique to human microbiome research.
conclusionsWe revisit the ELSI of biobanking and consider the impact that human microbiome research might have. Our discussion focuses on identifiability of human microbiome research samples, and return of research results and incidental findings for clinical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.