Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28077077›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2017

Estimating genomic diversity and population differentiation - an empirical comparison of microsatellite and SNP variation in Arabidopsis halleri.

Martin C Fischer, Christian Rellstab, Marianne Leuzinger, Marie Roumet, Felix Gugerli, Kentaro K Shimizu, Rolf Holderegger, Alex Widmer

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed
24.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed, 281 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Nucleotide diversity is a poor predictor of short-term adaptive potential.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Martin C FischerETH Zürich, Institute of Integrative Biology, Universitätstrasse 16, 8092, Zürich, Switzerland. martin.fischer@env.ethz.ch.
Christian RellstabWSL Swiss Federal Research Institute, Zürcherstrasse 111, 8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
Marianne LeuzingerETH Zürich, Institute of Integrative Biology, Universitätstrasse 16, 8092, Zürich, Switzerland.
Marie RoumetETH Zürich, Institute of Integrative Biology, Universitätstrasse 16, 8092, Zürich, Switzerland.
Felix GugerliWSL Swiss Federal Research Institute, Zürcherstrasse 111, 8903, Birmensdorf, Switzerland.
Kentaro K ShimizuInstitute of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies and Institute of Plant Biology, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057, Zürich, Switzerland.
Rolf HoldereggerETH Zürich, Institute of Integrative Biology, Universitätstrasse 16, 8092, Zürich, Switzerland.
Alex WidmerETH Zürich, Institute of Integrative Biology, Universitätstrasse 16, 8092, Zürich, Switzerland.
ETH Zurich · CHSwiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research · CHUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicrosatellite markers are widely used for estimating genetic diversity within and differentiation among populations. However, it has rarely been tested whether such estimates are useful proxies for genome-wide patterns of variation and differentiation. Here, we compared microsatellite variation with genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to assess and quantify potential marker-specific biases and derive recommendations for future studies. Overall, we genotyped 180 Arabidopsis halleri individuals from nine populations using 20 microsatellite markers. Twelve of these markers were originally developed for Arabidopsis thaliana (cross-species markers) and eight for A. halleri (species-specific markers). We further characterized 2 million SNPs across the genome with a pooled whole-genome re-sequencing approach (Pool-Seq).

resultsOur analyses revealed that estimates of genetic diversity and differentiation derived from cross-species and species-specific microsatellites differed substantially and that expected microsatellite heterozygosity (SSR-H

conclusionsWe recommend that future analyses of genetic diversity within and differentiation among populations use randomly selected high-throughput sequencing-based SNP data to draw conclusions on genome-wide diversity patterns. In species comparable to A. halleri, a few thousand SNPs are sufficient to achieve this goal.

Indexed as

GenomicsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideArabidopsisGenome, PlantMicrosatellite RepeatsArabidopsis halleriConservation unitsExpected heterozygosityGenetic diversityMicrosatellitesPool-SeqPopulation genomicsSNPsSSRWhole-genome re-sequencing

Identifiers

PMID28077077
PMCPMC5225627
OpenAlexW2569487581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.