Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28076937›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of histochemistry : EJH2016

In vivo imaging techniques: a new era for histochemical analysis.

A Busato, P Fumene Feruglio, P P Parnigotto, P Marzola, A Sbarbati

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of histochemistry : EJH, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Spontaneous and Induced Animal Models for Cancer Research.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  6. Imaging techniques in nanomedical research.European journal of histochemistry : EJH · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Is there still room for novelty, in histochemical papers?European journal of histochemistry : EJH · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

A BusatoUniversity of Verona, Department of Computer Science. alice.busato@univr.it.
P Fumene Feruglio
P P Parnigotto
P Marzola
A Sbarbati

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vivo imaging techniques can be integrated with classical histochemistry to create an actual histochemistry of water. In particular, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), an imaging technique primarily used as diagnostic tool in clinical/preclinical research, has excellent anatomical resolution, unlimited penetration depth and intrinsic soft tissue contrast. Thanks to the technological development, MRI is not only capable to provide morphological information but also and more interestingly functional, biophysical and molecular. In this paper we describe the main features of several advanced imaging techniques, such as MRI microscopy, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, functional MRI, Diffusion Tensor Imaging and MRI with contrast agent as a useful support to classical histochemistry.

Indexed as

AnimalsHistocytochemistryHumansMagnetic Resonance Imaging

Identifiers

PMID28076937
PMCPMC5159782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.