Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28076812›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2017

Spermine Condenses DNA, but Not RNA Duplexes.

Andrea M Katz, Igor S Tolokh, Suzette A Pabit, Nathan Baker, Alexey V Onufriev, Lois Pollack

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Switch-like compaction of poly(ADP-ribose) upon cation binding.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  12. Dinuclear platinum(II) complexes as the pattern for phosphate backbone binding: a new perspective for recognition of binding modes to DNA.Journal of biological inorganic chemistry : JBIC : a publication of the Society of Biological Inorganic Chemistry · 2022
    Article
  13. Similarities and Differences between NaJournal of chemical theory and computation · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea M KatzSchool of Applied and Engineering Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Igor S TolokhDepartment of Computer Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia.
Suzette A PabitSchool of Applied and Engineering Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Nathan BakerAdvanced Computing, Mathematics, and Data Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.
Alexey V OnufrievDepartment of Computer Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia; Department of Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia.
Lois PollackSchool of Applied and Engineering Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York. Electronic address: lp26@cornell.edu.
Cornell University · USVirginia Tech · USPacific Northwest National Laboratory · US

Funding

DNA - DNA interactions with atomic detailR01GM099450 · NIGMS · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI BAKER, NATHAN A., ONUFRIEV, ALEXEY VLAD · 2012 to 2015
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM099450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interactions between the polyamine spermine and nucleic acids drive important cellular processes. Spermine condenses DNA and some RNAs, such as poly(rA):poly(rU). A large fraction of the spermine present in cells is bound to RNA but apparently does not condense it. Here, we study the effect of spermine binding to short duplex RNA and DNA, and compare our findings with predictions of molecular-dynamics simulations. When small numbers of spermine are introduced, RNA with a designed sequence containing a mixture of 14 GC pairs and 11 AU pairs resists condensation relative to DNA of an equivalent sequence or to 25 bp poly(rA):poly(rU) RNA. A comparison of wide-angle x-ray scattering profiles with simulation results suggests that spermine is sequestered deep within the major groove of mixed-sequence RNA. This prevents condensation by limiting opportunities to bridge to other molecules and stabilizes the RNA by locking it into a particular conformation. In contrast, for DNA, simulations suggest that spermine binds externally to the duplex, offering opportunities for intermolecular interaction. The goal of this study is to explain how RNA can remain soluble and available for interaction with other molecules in the cell despite the presence of spermine at concentrations high enough to precipitate DNA.

Indexed as

DNAMolecular Dynamics SimulationNucleic Acid ConformationRNASpermineDNARNASpermine

Identifiers

PMID28076812
PMCPMC5232352
OpenAlexW2570135590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.