ArticleJournal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences2017
Chromatographic efficiency and selectivity in top-down proteomics of histones.
Article in Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Capillary Zone Electrophoresis-Tandem Mass Spectrometry with Activated Ion Electron Transfer Dissociation for Large-scale Top-down Proteomics.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2019Article
- Proteins and Proteoforms: New Separation Challenges.Analytical chemistry · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Histones are involved in epigenetic control of a wide variety of cellular processes through their multiple post-translational modifications. Their strongly cationic nature makes them challenging to separate with reversed-phase liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (RPLC-MS), where trifluoroacetic acid is avoided due to adduct formation. Columns with higher resolution are needed. In this work, RPLC-MS is performed on a histone sample using difluoroacetic acid and a 20-min gradient. Columns with C18 surfaces are compared for two different types of particle morphologies: 1) fully porous particles of 5μm in diameter, 2) superficially porous particles of 3μm in diameter with a shell of 0.2μm. The resolution for the histone separation is better for the latter column, but only when the modifier is trifluoroacetic acid, which is used with UV absorbance detection. When difluoroacetic acid is used for LCMS, the peaks broaden enough to erase the advantage in efficiency for the superficially porous particles. The fully porous and superficially porous cases show similar performance in RPLC-MS, with slightly higher resolution for the fully porous particles. The expected advantage of the shorter diffusion distances for the superficially porous particles is shown to be outweighed by the lower selectivity of its bonded phase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.