Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28076685›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the American Thoracic Society2017

Diffusion of Evidence-based Intensive Care Unit Organizational Practices. A State-Wide Analysis.

Rachel Kohn, Vanessa Madden, Jeremy M Kahn, David A Asch, Amber E Barnato, Scott D Halpern, Meeta Prasad Kerlin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Do the Right Thing.Chest · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Teamwork in the intensive care unit.The American psychologist
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel Kohn1 Department of Medicine.
Vanessa Madden2 Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and.
Jeremy M Kahn4 Clinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness Center, Department of Critical Care Medicine, and.
David A Asch1 Department of Medicine.
Amber E Barnato5 Section of Decision Sciences, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Scott D Halpern1 Department of Medicine.
Meeta Prasad Kerlin1 Department of Medicine.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3239-1443
Center for Clinical Research (United States) · USMental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Centers · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Cardiology & pulmonary research training grantT32HL007891 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Jason D Christie · 1998 to 2026
$12.0M
The role of physician experience in outcomes of patients with acute respiratory fK08HL116771 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KERLIN, MEETA PRASAD · 2013 to 2017
$741k
NHLBI NIH HHS K08 HL116771NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007891
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleSeveral intensive care unit (ICU) organizational practices have been associated with improved patient outcomes. However, the uptake of these evidence-based practices is unknown.

objectivesTo assess diffusion of ICU organizational practices across the state of Pennsylvania.

methodsWe conducted two web-based, cross-sectional surveys of ICU organizational practices in Pennsylvania acute care hospitals, in 2005 (chief nursing officer respondents) and 2014 (ICU nurse manager respondents). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsOf 223 eligible respondents, nurse managers from 136 (61%) medical, surgical, mixed medical-surgical, cardiac, and specialty ICUs in 98 hospitals completed the 2014 survey, compared with 124 of 164 (76%) chief nursing officers in the 2005 survey. In 2014, daytime physician staffing models varied widely, with 23 of 136 (17%) using closed models and 33 (24%) offering no intensivist staffing. Nighttime intensivist staffing was used in 37 (27%) ICUs, 38 (28%) used nonintensivist attending staffing, and 24 (18%) had no nighttime attending physicians. Daily multidisciplinary rounds occurred in 93 (68%) ICUs. Regular participants included clinical pharmacists in 68 of 93 (73%) ICUs, respiratory therapists in 62 (67%), and advanced practitioners in 37 (39%). Patients and family members participated in rounds in 36 (39%) ICUs. Clinical protocols or checklists for mechanically ventilated patients were available in 128 of 133 (96%) ICUs, low tidal volume ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome in 54 of 132 (41%) ICUs, prone positioning for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome in 37 of 134 (28%) ICUs, and family meetings in 19 of 134 (14%) ICUs. Among 61 ICUs that responded to both surveys, there was a significant increase in the proportion of ICUs using nighttime in-ICU attending physicians (23 [38%] in 2005 vs. 30 [49%] in 2014; P = 0.006).

conclusionsThe diffusion of evidence-based ICU organizational practices has been variable across the state of Pennsylvania. Only half of Pennsylvania ICUs have intensivists dedicated to the ICU. Variable numbers use clinical protocols for life-saving therapies, and few use structured family engagement strategies. In contrast, the diffusion of non-evidence-based practices, including overnight ICU attending physician staffing, is increasing. Future research should focus on promoting implementation of organizational evidence to promote high-quality ICU care.

Indexed as

Patient-Centered CareClinical ProtocolsCritical IllnessCross-Sectional StudiesEvidence-Based NursingHospitalsHumansIntensive Care UnitsInterdisciplinary CommunicationInternetPennsylvaniaPersonnel Staffing and SchedulingSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkforceclinical protocolsintensive care unitsmultidisciplinary communicationpatient-centered carepersonnel staffing

Identifiers

PMID28076685
PMCPMC5427731
OpenAlexW2583340926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.