Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28076681›Full record

ArticleACS chemical neuroscience2017

Computational Modeling of Neurotransmitter Release Evoked by Electrical Stimulation: Nonlinear Approaches to Predicting Stimulation-Evoked Dopamine Release.

James K Trevathan, Ali Yousefi, Hyung Ook Park, John J Bartoletta, Kip A Ludwig, Kendall H Lee, J Luis Lujan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS chemical neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Evaluation of electrochemical methods for tonic dopamine detectionTrends in analytical chemistry : TRAC · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

James K TrevathanORCID 0000-0002-7282-4872
Ali YousefiDepartment of Neurologic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School , 25 Shattuck Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States.
Hyung Ook Park
John J Bartoletta
Kip A Ludwig
Kendall H Lee
J Luis Lujan

Funding

Neurochemical closed-loop controller for smart DBSR01NS084975 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI LUJAN, LUIS · 2014 to 2018
$2.0M
WINCS and DBSR01NS070872 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI LEE, KENDALL H. · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
WincsNanotrode development for DBSR01NS075013 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI LEE, KENDALL H. · 2011 to 2015
$1.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS070872NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS075013NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS084975
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurochemical changes evoked by electrical stimulation of the nervous system have been linked to both therapeutic and undesired effects of neuromodulation therapies used to treat obsessive-compulsive disorder, depression, epilepsy, Parkinson's disease, stroke, hypertension, tinnitus, and many other indications. In fact, interest in better understanding the role of neurochemical signaling in neuromodulation therapies has been a focus of recent government- and industry-sponsored programs whose ultimate goal is to usher in an era of personalized medicine by creating neuromodulation therapies that respond to real-time changes in patient status. A key element to achieving these precision therapeutic interventions is the development of mathematical modeling approaches capable of describing the nonlinear transfer function between neuromodulation parameters and evoked neurochemical changes. Here, we propose two computational modeling frameworks, based on artificial neural networks (ANNs) and Volterra kernels, that can characterize the input/output transfer functions of stimulation-evoked neurochemical release. We evaluate the ability of these modeling frameworks to characterize subject-specific neurochemical kinetics by accurately describing stimulation-evoked dopamine release across rodent (R

Indexed as

Computer SimulationDeep Brain StimulationModels, BiologicalNonlinear DynamicsAnimalsBrainElectrochemical TechniquesFemaleMacaca mulattaNeurotransmitter AgentsPredictive Value of TestsPrincipal Component AnalysisRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySwineTime FactorsNeurotransmitter Agentsartificial neural networkdeep brain stimulationdopamineFast scan cyclic voltammetrymachine learningneurochemical sensingVolterra kernels

Identifiers

PMID28076681
PMCPMC5373033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.