Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28076516›Full record

ArticleClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2016

Septic arthritis of the knee: clinical and laboratory comparison of groups with different etiologies.

Camilo Partezani Helito, Paulo Renan Lima Teixeira, Priscila Rosalba de Oliveira, Vladimir Cordeiro de Carvalho, José Ricardo Pécora, Gilberto Luis Camanho, Marco Kawamura Demange, Ana Lucia Munhoz Lima

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Management of joint empyema].Der Unfallchirurg · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Septic arthritis caused byBMJ case reports · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Camilo Partezani HelitoFaculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Divisão de Cirurgia do Joelho, Sa˜o Paulo/SP Brazil.
Paulo Renan Lima TeixeiraFaculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Divisão de Cirurgia do Joelho, Sa˜o Paulo/SP Brazil.
Priscila Rosalba de OliveiraFaculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Divisa˜o de Doenc¸as Infecciosas, Sa˜o Paulo/SP Brazil.
Vladimir Cordeiro de CarvalhoFaculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Divisa˜o de Doenc¸as Infecciosas, Sa˜o Paulo/SP Brazil.
José Ricardo PécoraFaculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Divisão de Cirurgia do Joelho, Sa˜o Paulo/SP Brazil.
Gilberto Luis CamanhoFaculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Divisão de Cirurgia do Joelho, Sa˜o Paulo/SP Brazil.
Marco Kawamura DemangeFaculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Divisão de Cirurgia do Joelho, Sa˜o Paulo/SP Brazil.
Ana Lucia Munhoz LimaFaculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Divisa˜o de Doenc¸as Infecciosas, Sa˜o Paulo/SP Brazil.
Sociedade Brasileira de Ortopedia e Traumatologia · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectives: To clinically and epidemiologically characterize a population diagnosed with and treated for septic arthritis of the knee, to evaluate the treatment results and to analyze the differences between patients with positive and negative culture results, patients with Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial isolates and patients with S. aureus- and non-S. aureus-related infections.

methods: One hundred and five patients with septic knee arthritis were included in this study. The clinical and epidemiological data were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed to compare patients with and without an isolated causative agent, patients with Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens and patients with S. aureus-related and non S. aureus-related infections.

results: Causative agents were isolated in 81 patients. Gram-positive bacteria were isolated in 65 patients and Gram-negative bacteria were isolated in 16 patients. The most commonly isolated bacterium was S. aureus. Comparing cases with an isolated pathogen to cases without an isolated pathogen, no differences between the studied variables were found except for the longer hospital stays of patients in whom an etiological agent was identified. When comparing Gram-positive bacteria with Gram-negative bacteria, patients with Gram-positive-related infections exhibited higher leukocyte counts. Patients with S. aureus-related infections were more frequently associated with healthcare-related environmental encounters.

conclusion: S. aureus is the most common pathogen of septic knee arthritis. Major differences were not observed between infections with isolated and non-isolated pathogens and between infections with Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. S. aureus infections were more likely to be associated with a prior healthcare environment exposure.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overArthritis, InfectiousBrazilChildChild, PreschoolC-Reactive ProteinFemaleGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Positive BacteriaHumansInfantKneeKnee JointC-Reactive Protein

Identifiers

PMID28076516
PMCPMC5175290
OpenAlexW2568675954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.