Trial reportPloS one2017
Exploring Nurses', Preschool Teachers' and Parents' Perspectives on Information Sharing Using SDQ in a Swedish Setting - A Qualitative Study Using Grounded Theory.
Trial report in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-professional and multi-agency model PLUSS to facilitate early detection and support of pre-school children with neurodevelopmental difficulties - a model description.BMC health services research · 2022Trial
- Agreement between mothers', fathers', and teachers' ratings of behavioural and emotional problems in 3-5-year-old children.PloS one · 2018Trial
- Swedish preschool teacher's preferences and experiences of an applied learning intervention to support children with ESSENCE symptoms.Annals of general psychiatry · 2026Article
- The assessment of preschool children with ESSENCE symptoms: concordance between parents, preschool teachers and child psychologists.BMC pediatrics · 2024Article
- Parental sociodemographic characteristics and mental health referrals by nurses in Swedish child health centres.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2022Article
- Experiences of Norwegian child and school health nurses with the "Starting Right™" child health assessment innovation: a qualitative interview study.BMC health services research · 2022Review
- Asthma and allergies correlate with mental health problems in preschool children.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2021Article
- Public health nurses' experiences of assessing disruptive behaviour in children and supporting the use of an Internet-based parent training programme.Scandinavian journal of caring sciences · 2020Article
- Swedish norms for the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for children 3-5 years rated by parents and preschool teachers.Scandinavian journal of psychology · 2020Article
- Article
- SDQ in the Hands of Fathers and Preschool Teachers-Psychometric Properties in a Non-clinical Sample of 3-5-Year-Olds.Child psychiatry and human development · 2019Article
- Health, public sector service use and related costs of Swedish preschool children: results from the Children and Parents in Focus trial.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evidence-based methods to identify behavioural problems among children are not regularly used within the Swedish Child healthcare. A new procedure was therefore introduced to assess children through parent- and preschool teacher reports using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). This study aims to explore nurses', preschool teachers' and parents' perspectives of this new information sharing model. Using the grounded theory methodology, semi-structured interviews with nurses (n = 10) at child health clinics, preschool teachers (n = 13) and parents (n = 11) of 3-, 4- and 5-year-old children were collected and analysed between March 2014 and June 2014. The analysis was conducted using constant comparative method. The participants were sampled purposively within a larger trial in Sweden. Results indicate that all stakeholders shared a desire to have a complete picture of the child's health. The perceptions that explain why the stakeholders were in favour of the new procedure-the 'causal conditions' in a grounded theory model-included: (1) Nurses thought that visits after 18-months were unsatisfactory, (2) Preschool teachers wanted to identify children with difficulties and (3) Parents viewed preschool teachers as being qualified to assess children. However, all stakeholders had doubts as to whether there was a reliable way to assess children's behaviour. Although nurses found the SDQ to be useful for their clinical evaluation, they noticed that not all parents chose to participate. Both teachers and parents acknowledged benefits of information sharing. However, the former had concerns about parental reactions to their assessments and the latter about how personal information was handled. The theoretical model developed describes that the causal conditions and current context of child healthcare in many respects endorse the introduction of information sharing. However, successful implementation requires considerable work to address barriers: the tension between normative thinking versus helping children with developmental problems for preschool teachers and dealing with privacy issues and inequity in participation for parents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.