Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28076371›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2017

Meta-Analysis of the Long Term Success Rate of Different Interventions in Benign Biliary Strictures.

Orsolya Huszár, Bálint Kokas, Péter Mátrai, Péter Hegyi, Erika Pétervári, Áron Vincze, Gabriella Pár, Patrícia Sarlós, Judit Bajor, József Czimmer and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Endoscopic management of benign and malignant hilar stricture.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Endoscopic Stents for the Biliary Tree and Pancreas.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2017
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Orsolya HuszárSemmelweis University, 1st Department of Surgery, Budapest, Hungary.
Bálint KokasSemmelweis University, 1st Department of Surgery, Budapest, Hungary.
Péter MátraiInstitute of Bioanalysis, University of Pécs, Medical School, Pécs, Hungary.
Péter HegyiInstitute for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Erika PéterváriInstitute for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Áron VinczeDivision of Gastroenterology, First Department of Medicine, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Gabriella PárDivision of Gastroenterology, First Department of Medicine, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Patrícia SarlósDivision of Translational Medicine, First Department of Medicine, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Judit BajorDivision of Translational Medicine, First Department of Medicine, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
József CzimmerDivision of Gastroenterology, First Department of Medicine, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Dóra MosztbacherDivision of Translational Medicine, First Department of Medicine, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Katalin MártaInstitute for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Csaba ZsiborásInstitute for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Péter VarjúInstitute for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Ákos SzücsSemmelweis University, 1st Department of Surgery, Budapest, Hungary.
University of Pecs · HUSemmelweis University · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBenign biliary stricture is a rare condition and the majority of the cases are caused by operative trauma or chronic inflammation based on various etiology. Although the initial results of endoscopic, percutaneous and surgical treatment are impressive, no comparison about long term stricture resolution is available.

aimsThe goal of this study was to compare the long term disease free survival in benign biliary strictures with various etiology after surgery, percutaneous transhepatic-and endoscopic treatment.

methodsPubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched by computer and manually for published studies. The investigators selected the publications according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, processed the data and assessed the quality of the selected studies. Meta-analysis of data of 24 publications was performed to compare long term disease free survival of different treatment groups.

resultsCompared the subgroups surgery resulted in the highest long term stricture resolution rate, followed by the percutaneous transhepatic treatment, the multiple plastic stent insertion and covered self-expanding metal stents (SEMS), however the difference was not significant. All compared methods are significantly superior to the single plastic stent placement. Long term stricture resolution rate irrespectively of any therapy is still not more than 84%.

conclusionsIn summary, the use of single plastic stent is not recommended. Further randomized studies and innovative technical development are required for improving the treatment of benign biliary strictures.

Indexed as

Postoperative ComplicationsBiliary Tract DiseasesConstriction, PathologicDisease-Free SurvivalEndoscopyHumansSelf Expandable Metallic Stents

Identifiers

PMID28076371
PMCPMC5226728
OpenAlexW2578547162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.