Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28076281›Full record

ArticleJournal of insect science (Online)2016

Transcriptome and Gene Expression Analysis of Cylas formicarius (Coleoptera: Brentidae) During Different Development Stages.

Juan Ma, Rongyan Wang, Xiuhua Li, Bo Gao, Shulong Chen

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of insect science (Online), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Comparative Transcriptome Analysis ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Effects of the termination of LCFrontiers in physiology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Juan MaInstitute of Plant Protection, Hebei Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences/IPM Centre of Hebei Province/Key Laboratory of Integrated Pest Management on Crops in Northern Region of North China, Ministry of Agriculture, 437 Dongguan Street, Baoding 071000, China (majuan_206@126.com; rongyanw@163.com; lixiuhua727@163.com; gaobo89@163.com; chenshulong65@163.com).
Rongyan WangInstitute of Plant Protection, Hebei Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences/IPM Centre of Hebei Province/Key Laboratory of Integrated Pest Management on Crops in Northern Region of North China, Ministry of Agriculture, 437 Dongguan Street, Baoding 071000, China (majuan_206@126.com; rongyanw@163.com; lixiuhua727@163.com; gaobo89@163.com; chenshulong65@163.com).
Xiuhua LiInstitute of Plant Protection, Hebei Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences/IPM Centre of Hebei Province/Key Laboratory of Integrated Pest Management on Crops in Northern Region of North China, Ministry of Agriculture, 437 Dongguan Street, Baoding 071000, China (majuan_206@126.com; rongyanw@163.com; lixiuhua727@163.com; gaobo89@163.com; chenshulong65@163.com).
Bo GaoInstitute of Plant Protection, Hebei Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences/IPM Centre of Hebei Province/Key Laboratory of Integrated Pest Management on Crops in Northern Region of North China, Ministry of Agriculture, 437 Dongguan Street, Baoding 071000, China (majuan_206@126.com; rongyanw@163.com; lixiuhua727@163.com; gaobo89@163.com; chenshulong65@163.com).
Shulong ChenInstitute of Plant Protection, Hebei Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences/IPM Centre of Hebei Province/Key Laboratory of Integrated Pest Management on Crops in Northern Region of North China, Ministry of Agriculture, 437 Dongguan Street, Baoding 071000, China (majuan_206@126.com; rongyanw@163.com; lixiuhua727@163.com; gaobo89@163.com; chenshulong65@163.com) chenshulong65@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sweet potato weevil, Cylas formicarius (F.) (Coleoptera: Brentidae), is an important pest of sweet potato worldwide. However, there is limited knowledge on the molecular mechanisms underlying growth and differentiation of C. formicarius The transcriptomes of the eggs, second instar larvae, third instar larvae (L3), pupae, females, and males of C. formicarius were sequenced using Illumina sequencing technology for obtaining global insights into developing transcriptome characteristics and elucidating the relative functional genes. A total of 54,255,544 high-quality reads were produced, trimmed, and de novo assembled into 115,281 contigs. 61,686 unigenes were obtained, with an average length of 1,009 nt. Among these unigenes, 17,348 were annotated into 59 Gene Ontology (GO) terms and 12,660 were assigned to 25 Cluster of Orthologous Groups classes, whereas 24,796 unigenes were mapped to 258 pathways. Differentially expressed unigenes between various developmental stages of C. formicarius were detected. Higher numbers of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were recorded in the eggs versus L3 and eggs versus male samples (2,141 and 2,058 unigenes, respectively) than the others. Genes preferentially expressed in each stage were also identified. GO and pathway-based enrichment analysis were used to further investigate the functions of the DEGs. In addition, the expression profiles of ten DEGs were validated by quantitative real-time PCR. The transcriptome profiles presented in this study and these DEGs detected by comparative analysis of different developed stages of C. formicarius will facilitate the understanding of the molecular mechanism of various living process and will contribute to further genome-wide research.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeAnimalsColeopteraFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalLife Cycle StagesMaledifferentially expressed genesdifferent stagessweet potato weeviltranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID28076281
PMCPMC7261484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.